Published October 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

2D-3D registration for prostate radiation therapy based on a statistical model of transmission images

  • 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, Connecticut 06520 and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, Connecticut 06520 (United States)
  • 2. Department of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, Connecticut 06520 (United States)
  • 3. Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G-2M9 (Canada)
  • 4. Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York 10021 (United States)

Description

Purpose: In external beam radiation therapy of pelvic sites, patient setup errors can be quantified by registering 2D projection radiographs acquired during treatment to a 3D planning computed tomograph (CT). We present a 2D-3D registration framework based on a statistical model of the intensity values in the two imaging modalities. Methods: The model assumes that intensity values in projection radiographs are independently but not identically distributed due to the nonstationary nature of photon counting noise. Two probability distributions are considered for the intensity values: Poisson and Gaussian. Using maximum likelihood estimation, two similarity measures, maximum likelihood with a Poisson (MLP) and maximum likelihood with Gaussian (MLG), distribution are derived. Further, we investigate the merit of the model-based registration approach for data obtained with current imaging equipment and doses by comparing the performance of the similarity measures derived to that of the Pearson correlation coefficient (ICC) on accurately collected data of an anthropomorphic phantom of the pelvis and on patient data. Results: Registration accuracy was similar for all three similarity measures and surpassed current clinical requirements of 3 mm for pelvic sites. For pose determination experiments with a kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam CT (CBCT) and kV projection radiographs of the phantom in the anterior-posterior (AP) view, registration accuracies were 0.42 mm (MLP), 0.29 mm (MLG), and 0.29 mm (ICC). For kV CBCT and megavoltage (MV) AP portal images of the same phantom, registration accuracies were 1.15 mm (MLP), 0.90 mm (MLG), and 0.69 mm (ICC). Registration of a kV CT and MV AP portal images of a patient was successful in all instances. Conclusions: The results indicate that high registration accuracy is achievable with multiple methods including methods that are based on a statistical model of a 3D CT and 2D projection images.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Medical Physics
Journal Volume
36
Journal Issue
10
Journal Page Range
p. 4555-4568
ISSN
0094-2405
CODEN
MPHYA6

Optional Information

Notes
(c) 2009 American Association of Physicists in Medicine