Published September 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Sectoral contributions to surface water stress in the coterminous United States

  • 1. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Western Water Assessment, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309 (United States)
  • 2. Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Raleigh, NC (United States)
  • 3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA (United States)
  • 4. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA (United States)

Description

Here, we assess current stress in the freshwater system based on the best available data in order to understand possible risks and vulnerabilities to regional water resources and the sectors dependent on freshwater. We present watershed-scale measures of surface water supply stress for the coterminous United States (US) using the water supply stress index (WaSSI) model which considers regional trends in both water supply and demand. A snapshot of contemporary annual water demand is compared against different water supply regimes, including current average supplies, current extreme-year supplies, and projected future average surface water flows under a changing climate. In addition, we investigate the contributions of different water demand sectors to current water stress. On average, water supplies are stressed, meaning that demands for water outstrip natural supplies in over 9% of the 2103 watersheds examined. These watersheds rely on reservoir storage, conveyance systems, and groundwater to meet current water demands. Overall, agriculture is the major demand-side driver of water stress in the US, whereas municipal stress is isolated to southern California. Water stress introduced by cooling water demands for power plants is punctuated across the US, indicating that a single power plant has the potential to stress water supplies at the watershed scale. On the supply side, watersheds in the western US are particularly sensitive to low flow events and projected long-term shifts in flow driven by climate change. The WaSSI results imply that not only are water resources in the southwest in particular at risk, but that there are also potential vulnerabilities to specific sectors, even in the 'water-rich' southeast. (letter)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035046

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Research Letters
Journal Volume
8
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
[9 p.]
ISSN
1748-9326

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44118791
Subject category
S58: GEOSCIENCES; S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
AGRICULTURE; CLIMATIC CHANGE; FRESH WATER; GROUND WATER; POWER PLANTS; VULNERABILITY; WATER CURRENTS; WATER REQUIREMENTS; WATER RESOURCES; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHEDS
Descriptors DEC
CURRENTS; DEMAND; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; RESOURCES; WATER