Published 1990 | Version v1
Book

Lessons learned from applying external input to DOE policy decision making

  • 1. Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA (United States). Management Systems Labs.

Description

Our nation has entered an era in which the public is demanding clean up and restoration of its environment, understandable information, and participation in decision making. The US Department of Energy's (DOE's) culture, which grew out of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) culture of classification, compartmentalization, and strict-need-to-know dissemination of information, was in direct conflict with this demand for public involvement. The DOE recognized this and committed to changing their culture into one of openness and public involvement in decision making and policy direction. This paper reports that as a result, DOE created a number of external review groups, one of them being the State and Tribal Government Working Group (STGWG). The STGWG was created to review the first Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Five-Year Plan. The Five-Year Plan establishes an agenda for compliance and cleanup of DOE installations against which progress can be measured

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
American Nuclear Society.
Imprint Place
La Grange Park, IL (United States)
ISBN
0-89448-154-1
Imprint Title
Proceedings of SPECTRUM '90
Imprint Pagination
505 p.
Journal Page Range
p. 12-15.

Conference

Title
American Nuclear Society (ANS) international meeting on radioactive waste technologies, decontamination, and hazardous wastes.
Acronym
Spectrum '90
Dates
30 Sep - 4 Oct 1990.
Place
Knoxville, TN (United States).

Optional Information

Secondary number(s)
CONF-900977--.