Published July 1988 | Version v1
Miscellaneous Open

A non-flowering green panic grass (Panicum maximum var. trichoglume) obtained through gamma irradiation

  • 1. Department of Agricultural Botany, University of Agric. Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore (India)

Description

Full text: Suppression of flowering has many advantages in a forage crop. Such genotypes are not only expected to give more yield but also to be more nutritious. Non-flowering plants also remain fresh and green for a longer period in the field compared to the flowering types. Green panic (Panicum maximum var. trichoglume) is a high yielding, nutritious, fast growing and drought tolerant grass that has a potential to grow even under partial shade conditions. However, the major drawback of this grass is that it flowers early and profusely, with the result that most of the nutrients are diverted towards panicle formation. With an objective to suppress the panicle initiation a mutation breeding programme was taken up. Seeds of green panic grass were subjected to gamma ray treatment with doses of 40, 50 and 60 krad. From the large spectrum of variation observed for flowering habit quite a few non-flowering plants were isolated and of these the one from 40 krad treatment was prominent. This non-flowering plant yielded more green foliage than the flowering type and recorded an increase to the extend of 10.5% and 22.5% in monthly and bi-monthly harvests respectively. The increase in green foliage yield was directly attributable to an increase in the number of tillers and concomitant reduction in culm weight. Unlike in the flowering types the mutant had more accumulation of dry matter in the leaves rather than the stem. Further nutritional analysis of leaves showed that the non-flowering plant is superior with 6.04% crude protein which represents 100% increase over that of flowering type. The calcium content (0.5%) was also double and the moisture content (11.70%) was higher in the non-flowering plant. The crude fibre content was reduced by 2%. Inhibition of flowering is a common feature in mutagen treated material, but it is seldom inherited. In sugarcane non-arrowing mutants have been induced with advantage to increase the sugar content (Walker and Sisodia, 1969). The present investigation demonstrated the possibility of suppressing flowering in forage grasses. (author)

Files

33017213.pdf

Files (44.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c53dc1387e84a64d66db778a44d9ea75
44.6 kB Preview Download
Part of:
Mutation breeding newsletter. No. 32

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
IAEA
Imprint Place
Vienna (Austria)
Imprint Title
Mutation breeding newsletter. No. 32
Imprint Pagination
36 p.
Journal Page Range
p. 9-10
ISSN
1011-260X
Report number
INIS-XA--480

INIS

Country of Publication
Austria
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
33017213
Subject category
S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
FORAGE; GRAMINEAE; PLANT BREEDING; RADIATION INDUCED MUTANTS; RADIOSTERILIZATION; SEEDS
Descriptors DEC
ANIMAL FEEDS; FOOD; IRRADIATION; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MUTANTS; PLANTS; STERILIZATION

Optional Information

Notes
1 ref