Published December 2015 | Version v1
Journal article

Sensitivity of novel 460 MPa proof strength titanium–vanadium microalloyed high strength low alloy steels to annealing linespeed and soak temperature

  • 1. Product Technology, Tata Steel Strip Products UK, Technical Development Centre, Harbourside Business Park, Port Talbot SA13 1SB (United Kingdom)

Description

Highlights: • Two novel high strength low alloy grades with titanium and vanadium alloy additions • Continuous annealing simulations to determine sensitivity to annealing conditions • Alloy additions raise recrystallisation temperature. • Higher recrystallisation temperature narrows annealing process window. • Significant variation in properties with small variations in annealing conditions - Abstract: High strength low alloy steels are characterised by predominantly ferritic microstructures, strengthened by grain boundary and precipitation strengthening. Both of these strengthening mechanisms traditionally arise from the niobium addition. Increasing the niobium addition would theoretically increase strength. However, increasing niobium content above ~ 0.04 wt.% is not recommended in industrial practice due to narrowing of the annealing process window. Two novel grades exhibiting different additions of titanium and vanadium in place of the traditional niobium addition were investigated. Sensitivity to annealing linespeed and soak temperature was investigated to conclude whether a practically achievable process window exists and moreover, to conclude whether proof strength in excess of 420 MPa could be achieved while satisfying the maximum ultimate tensile strength and minimum total elongation specifications of CEN Grade HC420LA under European Standard EN 10268:2006. One of the two novel grades, exhibiting higher manganese and vanadium contents, met the minimum proof strength target, while almost satisfying the maximum ultimate tensile strength and minimum total elongation specifications. However, the annealed microstructure was found to be partially recrystallised, which is not recommended in industrial practice. Moreover, sensitivity to annealing linespeed and soak temperature was considered too great to obtain a practically achievable process window.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.138

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.138;
PII
S0264127515302070;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Materials and Design
Journal Volume
86
Journal Page Range
p. 714-722
ISSN
0264-1275

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.