Cancer and low dose responses In Vivo: implications for radiation protection
Description
This paper discusses the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis, risk prediction and radiation protection. The summary implications for the radiation protection system are that at low doses the conceptual basis of the present system appears to be incorrect. The belief that the current system embodies the precautionary principle and that the LNT assumption is cautious appears incorrect. The concept of dose additivity appears incorrect. Effective dose (Sievert) and the weighting factors on which it is based appear to be invalid. There may be no constant and appropriate value of DDREF for radiological protection dosimetry. The use of dose as a predictor of risk needs to be re-examined. The use of dose limits as a means of limiting risk need to be re-evaluated
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Canadian Nuclear Society Bulletin
- Journal Volume
- 27
- Journal Issue
- 4
- Journal Page Range
- p. 23-26
- ISSN
- 0714-7074
Conference
- Title
- 15. Pacific basin nuclear conference
- Dates
- Oct 2006
- Place
- Sydney (Australia)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Canada
- Country of Input or Organization
- Canada
- INIS RN
- 38044030
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- LOW DOSE IRRADIATION; NEOPLASMS; RADIATION PROTECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; THRESHOLD DOSE
- Descriptors DEC
- DISEASES; DOSES; IRRADIATION; RADIATION DOSES
Optional Information
- Notes
- 15 refs.