Published December 2006 | Version v1
Journal article

Cancer and low dose responses In Vivo: implications for radiation protection

  • 1. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River, Ontario (Canada)

Description

This paper discusses the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis, risk prediction and radiation protection. The summary implications for the radiation protection system are that at low doses the conceptual basis of the present system appears to be incorrect. The belief that the current system embodies the precautionary principle and that the LNT assumption is cautious appears incorrect. The concept of dose additivity appears incorrect. Effective dose (Sievert) and the weighting factors on which it is based appear to be invalid. There may be no constant and appropriate value of DDREF for radiological protection dosimetry. The use of dose as a predictor of risk needs to be re-examined. The use of dose limits as a means of limiting risk need to be re-evaluated

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Canadian Nuclear Society Bulletin
Journal Volume
27
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 23-26
ISSN
0714-7074

Conference

Title
15. Pacific basin nuclear conference
Dates
Oct 2006
Place
Sydney (Australia)

INIS

Country of Publication
Canada
Country of Input or Organization
Canada
INIS RN
38044030
Subject category
S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
LOW DOSE IRRADIATION; NEOPLASMS; RADIATION PROTECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; THRESHOLD DOSE
Descriptors DEC
DISEASES; DOSES; IRRADIATION; RADIATION DOSES

Optional Information

Notes
15 refs.