Who shapes the environmental policy in the global south? Unpacking the reality of Nepal
- 1. Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forests and Environment, Sudoorpaschim Province, Dhangadhi (Nepal)
- 2. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, 4350, Queensland (Australia)
- 3. Ministry of Forests and Environment, Singh Durbar, Kathmandu (Nepal)
- 4. University of Hamburg (Germany)
- 5. Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000 (China)
Description
Highlights: • We assessed the makers and shapers of environmental policy making in Nepal. • Policy making is determined by the discursive practices of broad interest groups. • International organizations, to a large extent, influence the scope of environmental policy. • Environmental policy making is blamed to be government monolithic and expert-based. • Transdisciplinary approach to policy is crucial to solve environmental problems. Environmental policy is crucial for defining the scope of conservation and development at the local, national, and international level. Because of its broader framework for balancing conservation and development, environmental policy is considered as the concern of all actors representing multiple disciplines, ranging from environmentalists to development professionals. However, the current practice of environmental policy-making is blamed to be government monolithic and expert-based, which ignored the importance of local communities. In this context, we aimed to analyze the architecture of policy stakeholders and actors' constellation in the environmental policy-making process in the global south, by taking a case of Nepal. We reviewed national environmental policy milestones (n = 5) and scientific literature (n = 48) and undertook key informant interviews (n = 25) with seven policy stakeholder groups. The developmental history of environmental policy was reviewed from the perspective of policy actors and institutions. We found an increasing involvement of non-governmental (as well as donor) actors in setting the context and framing of the environmental policies. However, the selection of tools of actions of environmental policy was dominated by the discursive sphere of government officials, experts, and international organizations. In addition, implementation mechanisms and institutional arrangements for the transformation of policy objectives into implementation were largely subjugated by government officials, which in turn obstructed in the achievement of the policy outcomes and led to policy failure. We recommend adopting transdisciplinary policy-making approach to solve the complex environmental issues and development imperatives of the country.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.04.008Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.04.008;
- PII
- S1462901121001052;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Environmental Science and Policy
- Journal Volume
- 121
- Journal Page Range
- p. 78-88
- ISSN
- 1462-9011
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 53123930
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- ARCHITECTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; IMPLEMENTATION; INTEREST GROUPS; NEPAL; REVIEWS
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DOCUMENT TYPES; GOVERNMENT POLICIES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.