Mapping soil pollution by using drone image recognition and machine learning at an arsenic-contaminated agricultural field
Creators
- 1. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084 (China)
- 2. School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48104 (United States)
- 3. School of Real Estate and Land Management, Royal Agricultural University, Cirencester, GL7 1RS (United Kingdom)
- 4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon (China)
- 5. School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan (China)
Description
Highlights: • Four machine learning algorithms were developed to predict As risk levels. • The ERF algorithm performed best overall. • Prediction performance was generally better than that of traditional Kriging. • Heterogeneity of soil pollution poses challenges to soil arsenic risk mapping. • The fertilizer factory was the primary pollution source in this area. Mapping soil contamination enables the delineation of areas where protection measures are needed. Traditional soil sampling on a grid pattern followed by chemical analysis and geostatistical interpolation methods (GIMs), such as Kriging interpolation, can be costly, slow and not well-suited to highly heterogeneous soil environments. Here we propose a novel method to map soil contamination by combining high-resolution aerial imaging (HRAI) with machine learning algorithms. To support model establishment and validation, 1068 soil samples were collected from an arsenic (As) contaminated area in Zhongxiang, Hubei province, China. The average arsenic concentration was 39.88 mg/kg (SD = 213.70 mg/kg), with individual sample points determined as low risk (66.9%), medium risk (29.4%), or high risk (3.7%), respectively. Then, identified features were extracted from a HRAI image of the study area. Four machine learning algorithms were developed to predict As risk levels, including (i) support vector machine (SVM), (ii) multi-layer perceptron (MLP), (iii) random forest (RF), and (iii) extreme random forest (ERF). Among these, we found that the ERF algorithm performed best overall and that its prediction performance was generally better than that of traditional Kriging interpolation. The accuracy of ERF in test area 1 reached 0.87, performing better than RF (0.81), MLP (0.78) and SVM (0.77). The F1-score of ERF for discerning high-risk points in test area 1 was as high as 0.8. The complexity of the distribution of points with different risk levels was a decisive factor in model prediction ability. Identified features in the study area associated with fertilizer factories had the most important contribution to the ERF model. This study demonstrates that HRAI combined with machine learning has good potential to predict As soil risk levels.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116281Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116281;
- PII
- S0269749120369700;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Environmental Pollution (1987)
- Journal Volume
- 270
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0269-7491
- CODEN
- ENPOEK
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54044987
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; S47: OTHER INSTRUMENTATION;
- Descriptors DEI
- CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION; FERTILIZERS; FORESTS; HEALTH HAZARDS; KRIGING; LAND POLLUTION; LAND POLLUTION CONTROL; MACHINE LEARNING; MAPPING; POLLUTION SOURCES; REMOTE SENSING; SAMPLING; SOILS; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES; VECTORS
- Descriptors DEC
- AIRCRAFT; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CONTROL; HAZARDS; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MATHEMATICS; POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL; STATISTICS; TENSORS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.