Published October 1, 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Effect of Intrafraction Prostate Motion on Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Delivery: A Quantitative Assessment

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (United States)
  • 2. Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (United States)

Description

Purpose: To assess the dosimetric impact caused by the interplay between intrafraction prostate motion and the intermittent delivery of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). Methods and Materials: A cohort of 10 prostate patients was treated with PBS using a bilateral single-field uniform dose (SFUD) modality. Bilateral intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were generated for comparison. Because beam-on time in PBS was intermittent, the actual beam-on time was determined from treatment logs. Prostate motion was generalized according to real-time Calypso tracking data from our previously reported prospective photon trial. We investigated potential dose deviations by considering the interplay effect resulting from the worst-case scenario motion and the PBS delivery sequence. Results: For both bilateral-field SFUD and IMPT plans, clinical target volume (CTV) D99% coverage was degraded <2% owing to prostate intrafraction motion when averaged over the course of treatment, but was >10% for the worst fraction. The standard deviation of CTV D99% distribution was approximately 1.2%. The CTV coverage of individual fields in SFUD plans degraded as time elapsed after the initial alignment, owing to prostate drift. Intensity-modulated proton therapy and SFUD demonstrated comparable results when bilateral opposed fields were used. Single-field SFUD plans that were repainted twice, which could reduce half of the treatment time, resulted in similar CTV coverage as bilateral-field plans. Conclusions: Intrafraction prostate motion affects the actual delivered dose to CTV; however, when averaged over the course of treatment, CTV D99% coverage degraded only approximately 2% even for the worst-case scenario. The IMPT plan results are comparable to those of the SFUD plan, and similar coverage can be achieved if treated by SFUD 1 lateral field per day when rescanning the field twice to shorten the treatment time and mitigate intrafraction motion

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.048

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.048;
PII
S0360-3016(13)00645-7;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
87
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 375-382
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
45089127
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; PROSTATE; PROTON BEAMS; PROTONS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY
Descriptors DEC
BARYONS; BEAMS; BODY; DOSES; ELEMENTARY PARTICLES; EVALUATION; FERMIONS; GLANDS; HADRONS; MALE GENITALS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; NUCLEON BEAMS; NUCLEONS; ORGANS; PARTICLE BEAMS; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.