Open cell polyurethane foam compression failure characterization and its relationship to morphometry
Creators
- 1. Centre of Research in Mechanical Engineering - CIIM, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Materials, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, 46022 Valencia (Spain)
- 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911, Leganés, Madrid (Spain)
- 3. Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, 46022 Valencia (Spain)
- 4. Institute of Mechanical and Biomechanical Engineering - I2MB, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, 46022 Valencia (Spain)
Description
Highlights: • MicroCT-based FE models correctly predict compression failure loads and patterns • Morphometric analysis explains the anisotropic behavior of open cell foams • Significant relationships are found between morphometry and failure response • Digital image correlation detects the failure pattern and allows FE validation Open cell polyurethane foams are often used as cancellous bone surrogates because of their similarities in morphology and mechanical response. In this work, open cell polyurethane foams of three different densities are characterized from morphometric and mechanical perspectives. The analysis of micro-computed tomography images has revealed that the high density foams present the greatest inhomogeneities. Those inhomogeneities promoted the failure location. We have used the finite element models as a tool to estimate elastic and failure properties that can be used in numerical modeling. Furthermore, we have assessed the anisotropic mechanical response of the foams, whose differences are related to the morphometric inhomogeneities. We found significant relationships between morphometry and the elastic and failure response. The detailed information about morphometry, elastic constants and strength limits provided in this work can be of interest to researchers and practitioners that often use these polyurethane foams in orthopedic implants and cement augmentation evaluations.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111754Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111754;
- PII
- S0928493120336730;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Materials Science and Engineering. C, Biomimetic Materials, Sensors and Systems
- Journal Volume
- 120
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0928-4931
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54045941
- Subject category
- S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ANISOTROPY; CEMENTS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DENSITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FOAMS; MORPHOLOGY; POLYURETHANES; SKELETON
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; BUILDING MATERIALS; CALCULATION METHODS; COLLOIDS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISPERSIONS; MATERIALS; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC POLYMERS; ORGANS; PETROCHEMICALS; PETROLEUM PRODUCTS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; PLASTICS; POLYAMIDES; POLYMERS; SIMULATION; SYNTHETIC MATERIALS; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.