Published July 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR

  • 1. Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574 (Japan)
  • 2. Tohoku University, Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryomachi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574 (Japan)
  • 3. Tohoku University Hospital, Radiation Technology, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574 (Japan)

Description

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the hybrid deformable image registration (DIR) method in comparison with intensity-based DIR for pelvic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, using intensity and anatomical information. Ten prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were studied. Nine or ten CBCT scans were performed for each patient. First, rigid registration was performed between the planning CT and all CBCT images using gold fiducial markers, and then DIR was performed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and center of mass (COM) displacement were used to evaluate the quantitative DIR accuracy. The average DSCs for intensity-based DIR for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and seminal vesicles were 0.84 ± 0.05, 0.75 ± 0.05, 0.69 ± 0.07 and 0.65 ± 0.11, respectively, whereas those values for hybrid DIR were 0.98 ± 0.00, 0.97 ± 0.01, 0.98 ± 0.00 and 0.94 ± 0.03, respectively (P < 0.05). The average COM displacements for intensity-based DIR for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and seminal vesicles were 2.0 ± 1.5, 3.7 ± 1.4, 7.8 ± 2.2 and 3.6 ± 1.2 mm, whereas those values for hybrid DIR were 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.3 ± 0.2, 0.2 ± 0.1 and 0.6 ± 0.6 mm, respectively (P < 0.05). These results showed that the DSC for hybrid DIR had a higher DSC value and smaller COM displacement for all structures and all patients, compared with intensity-based DIR. Thus, the accumulative dose based on hybrid DIR might be trusted as a high-precision dose estimation method that takes into account organ movement during treatment radiotherapy.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrw123; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5569957

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Radiation Research
Journal Volume
58
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 567-571
ISSN
0449-3060

INIS

Country of Publication
Japan
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49049930
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; HYBRIDIZATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; PERFORMANCE; PROSTATE; RADIOTHERAPY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; GLANDS; MALE GENITALS; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; PROCESSING; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
Notes
PMCID: PMC5569957; PMID: 28158642; PUBLISHER-ID: rrw123; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:5569957