Published July 24, 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Toward understanding the effect of low-activity waste glass composition on sulfur solubility

  • 1. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  • 2. The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. (United States)
  • 3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, Richland WA (United States)

Description

The concentration of sulfur in nuclear waste glass melter feed must be maintained below the point where salt accumulates on the melt surface. The allowable concentrations may range from 0.37 to over 2.05 weight percent (of SO3 on a calcined oxide basis) depending on the composition of the melter feed and processing conditions. If the amount of sulfur exceeds the melt tolerance level, a molten salt will accumulate, which may upset melter operations and potentially shorten the useful life of the melter. At the Hanford site, relatively conservative limits have been placed on sulfur loading in melter feed, which in turn significantly increases the amount of glass that will be produced. Crucible-scale sulfur solubility data and scaled melter sulfur tolerance data have been collected on simulated Hanford waste glasses over the last 15 years. These data were compiled and analyzed. A model was developed to predict the solubility of SO3 in glass based on 252 simulated Hanford low-activity waste (LAW) glass compositions. This model represents the data well, accounting for over 85% of the variation in data, and was well validated. The model was also found to accurately predict the tolerance for sulfur in melter feed for 13 scaled melter tests of simulated LAW glasses. The model can be used to help estimate glass volumes and make informed decisions on process options. The model also gives quantitative estimates of component concentration effects on sulfur solubility. The components that most increase sulfur solubility are Li2O > V2O5> CaO ≈ P2O5 > Na2O ≈ B2O3 > K2O. The components that most decrease sulfur solubility are Cl > Cr2O3 > Al2O3 > ZrO2 ≈ SnO2 > Others ≈ SiO2. As a result, the order of component effects is similar to previous literature data, in most cases

Availability note (English)

Available from: DOI:10.1111/jace.13125; DOE Accepted Manuscript full text, or the publishers Best Available Version will be available free of charge after the embargo period from OSTI using http://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1123706

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Journal Volume
97
Journal Issue
10
Journal Page Range
p. 3135-3142
ISSN
0002-7820