Published January 2020 | Version v1
Journal article

Repeatability of amide proton transfer–weighted signals in the brain according to clinical condition and anatomical location

  • 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Song pa-gu, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. Department of Neurology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)

Description

To investigate whether clinical condition, imaging session, and locations affect repeatability of amide proton transfer–weighted (APTw) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the brain. Three APTw MRI data sets were acquired, involving two intrasession scans and one intersession scan for 19 healthy, 15 glioma, and 12 acute stroke adult participants (mean age 53.8, 54.6, and 68.5, respectively) on a 3T MR scanner. The mean APTw signals from five locations in healthy brain (supratentorial and infratentorial locations) and from entire tumor and stroke lesions (supratentorial location) were calculated. The within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated for each clinical conditions, image sessions, and anatomic locations. Differences in APTw signals between sessions were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. The ICC and wCV were 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91–0.99) and 16.1 (12.6–21.3) in glioma, 0.93 (0.82–0.98) and 15.0 (11.4–20.6) in stroke, and 0.84 (0.72–0.91) and 34.0 (28.7–41.0) in healthy brain. There were no significant differences in APTw signal between three sessions, irrespective of disease condition and location. The ICC and wCV were 0.85 (0.68–0.94) and 27.4 (21.8–35.6) in supratentorial, and 0.44 (− 0.18 to 0.76) and 32.7 (25.9 to 42.9) in infratentorial locations. There were significant differences in APTw signal between supra- (mean, 0.49%; 95% CI, 0.38–0.61) and infratentorial locations (1.09%, 0.98–1.20; p < 0.001). The repeatability of APTw signal was excellent in supratentorial locations, while it was poor in infratentorial locations due to severe B0 inhomogeneity and susceptibility which affects MTR asymmetry.

Availability note (English)

Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06285-7

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
30
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 346-356
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3