Published October 1, 2007 | Version v1
Journal article

CT-automatic exposure control devices: What are their performances?

  • 1. University Institute for Radiation Physics (IRA-DUMSC), Grand-Pre 1, CH-1007 Lausanne (Switzerland)
  • 2. Radiology Department, University Hospital of Lausanne, CHUV, CH-1011 Lausanne (Switzerland)

Description

Purpose: To avoid unnecessary exposure to the patients, constructors have developed tube current modulation algorithms. The purpose of this work is to assess the performance of computed tomography (CT) tube current modulation concerning patient dose and image noise in MSCT scanners. Material and methods: A conical PMMA phantom with elliptical cross-section, to vary the thickness of the irradiated object in a monotonous way, and an anthropomorphic chest phantom were scanned under similar conditions on a general electrics (GE) LightSpeed VCT (64 slices) scanner. Noise measurements were made by calculating the standard deviation of the CT-number on a homogeneous ROI in both phantoms. The dose was estimated with the parameters read in the DICOM header of each studied image. Results: The study has shown that most of the time, constant noise levels (noise index) can be obtained by a variation of the mA. Nevertheless, this adaptation can be not fast enough when the variation of the attenuation changes is rapid. Thus, an adaptation length up to 5 cm was obtained. A 18% dose reduction can be achieved (mean of 9.9%) by switching from z-axis modulation algorithm to xyz-axis modulation option. However, exposure in the chest area can be higher with current modulation than without, when trying to keep an image noise level constant in thoraco-abdominal investigations. Conclusion: Current modulation algorithms can produce inadequate quality images due to problems with tube current stabilization when a sudden attenuation variation takes place as at the start of a scanning sequence. As expected, rotational (xyz-axis) modulation performs better than only z-axis modulation algorithm. The use of automatic exposure control (AEC) can lead to an increase of the dose if the maximum allowed current is not properly set in thoraco-abdominal acquisitions

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.06.117

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.nima.2007.06.117;
PII
S0168-9002(07)01308-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research. Section A, Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Journal Volume
580
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 990-995
ISSN
0168-9002
CODEN
NIMAER

Conference

Title
3. international conference on imaging techniques in subatomic physics, astrophysics, medicine, biology and industry
Dates
27-30 Sep 2006
Place
Stockholm (Sweden)

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
39062253
Subject category
S46: INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
ALGORITHMS; ATTENUATION; CHEST; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROL; CURRENTS; EQUIPMENT; IMAGES; IRRADIATION; MODULATION; NOISE; OPTIMIZATION; PATIENTS; PERFORMANCE; PHANTOMS; PMMA; RADIATION DOSES; THICKNESS; VARIATIONS
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIMENSIONS; DOSES; ESTERS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MOCKUP; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC POLYMERS; POLYACRYLATES; POLYMERS; POLYVINYLS; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TOMOGRAPHY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.