MRI assessment program. Consensus statement on clinical efficacy of MRI
Description
This consensus statement is largely based on the experience gained at the MRI units at the four hospitals which have operated scanners in the MRI program. It reflects the considered opinion of the radiologists responsible for the MRI services at those hospitals. Account has also been taken of relevant overseas data. This collection of opinion relates particularly to comparison with other imaging modalities. The specific comments will require further consideration as technical developments with MRI become available, additional experience is gained with gadolinium contrast material and additional data are obtained on the influence of MRI on patient management. MRI, at present, is used either to improve diagnostic accuracy when other tests are negative or equivocal, when there is strong clinical suspicion of disease, or to improve surgical or other management planning when the diagnosis known. In some situations (eg syringomyelia, congenital spinal disease, posterior fossa/cerebello-pontine angle tumours) it may entirely replace other tests (eg myelography, air contrast, CT) which are substantially less accurate and/or more invasive. In other situations (eg hemispheric brain tumours, lumbar disc protrusions) when other tests, such as CT, can be as accurate, MRI is not usually or initially indicated because it is currently more expensive and of limited availability. However, balanced against this is the fact that it does not expose the patient to potentially harmful ionising radiation. It is also stressed that MRI images depend on complex, widely variable and, as yet, incompletely understood parameters. There is concern that this may result in false positive diagnoses, especially where MRI is used alone as a screening test, or used as the initial test. For several reasons (availability, cost, medical and diagnostic efficacy), the specific comments on indications for MRI presented are based upon the assumption that MRI is a tertiary and complementary imaging examination, requested only by independent specialists for appropriate indications
Availability note (English)
Available from INIS in electronic formFiles
30003849.pdf
Files
(150.9 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:ff940726f626ace7ea867f3b63f7e141
|
150.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Publisher
- Australian Institute of Health
- ISBN
- 0 642 13736 6
- Imprint Pagination
- 15 p.
- Report number
- INIS-AU--0026
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Australia
- Country of Input or Organization
- Australia
- INIS RN
- 30003849
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- AUSTRALIA; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DIAGNOSTIC USES; EFFICIENCY; HEALTH HAZARDS; HOSPITALS; NMR IMAGING; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Descriptors DEC
- AUSTRALASIA; BUILDINGS; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; EVALUATION; HAZARDS; MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENTS; USES