Published September 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions: Lessons from state climate action plans

  • 1. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, 301 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (United States)

Description

We examine how state-level factors affect greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction policy preference across the United States by analyzing climate action plans (CAPs) developed in 11 states and surveying the CAP advisory group members. This research offers insights into how states approach the problem of choosing emissions-abatement options that maximize benefits and minimize costs, given their unique circumstances and the constellation of interest groups with power to influence state policy. The state CAPs recommended ten popular GHG reduction strategies to accomplish approximately 90% of emissions reductions, but they recommended these popular strategies in different proportions: a strategy that is heavily relied on in one state's overall portfolio may play a negligible role in another state. This suggests that any national policy to limit GHG emissions should encompass these key strategies, but with flexibility to allow states to balance their implementation for the state's unique geographic, economic, and political circumstances. Survey results strongly support the conclusion that decisions regarding GHG reductions are influenced by the mix of actors at the table. Risk perception is associated with job type for all strategies, and physical and/or geographic factors may underlie the varying reliance on certain GHG reduction strategies across states. - Highlights: → This study analyzed climate action plans from 12 states and surveyed the advisory group members. → Ten strategies supply 90% of recommended emission reductions, but states weigh them differently. → Advisory group members perceived different opportunities and risks in the top-ten strategies. → Both geographic and socio-political factors may underlie the varying reliance on certain strategies. → Cost, business practices and consumer behavior were ranked as the top barriers to reducing emissions.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.020

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.020;
PII
S0301-4215(11)00392-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
39
Journal Issue
9
Journal Page Range
p. 5429-5439
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
43067471
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT; AVAILABILITY; BUSINESS; CLIMATES; COST; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GASES; HAZARDS; INTEREST GROUPS; USA
Descriptors DEC
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; NORTH AMERICA; POLLUTION ABATEMENT

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.