Published March 2007 | Version v1
Journal article

Consumer preference not to choose: Methodological and policy implications

  • 1. Public Policy and Economics, University of Maryland, Baltimore County (United States)

Description

Residential consumers remain reluctant to choose new electricity suppliers. Even the most successful jurisdictions, four US states and other countries, have had to adopt extensive consumer education procedures that serve largely to confirm that choosing electricity suppliers is daunting. Electricity is not unique in this respect; numerous studies find that consumers are generally reluctant to switch brands, even when they are well-informed about product characteristics. If consumers prefer not to choose, opening regulated markets can reduce welfare, even for some consumers who do switch, as the incumbent can exploit this preference by raising price above the formerly regulated level. Policies to open markets might be successful even if limited to industrial and commercial customers, with residential prices based on those in nominally competitive wholesale markets

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.023;
PII
S0301-4215(06)00196-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
35
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 1616-1627
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
38031518
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
CONSUMPTION RATES; DEREGULATION; ELECTRIC POWER; ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; MARKET; PRICES
Descriptors DEC
INDUSTRY; POWER

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2006 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.