Published October 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve at 3.0 T using different MR scanners: Agreement of FA and ADC measurements

  • 1. Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091 (Switzerland)
  • 2. The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, JHOC 3262, Baltimore, MD, 21287 (United States)
  • 3. Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich, 8008 (Switzerland)

Description

Objective: To assess the agreement of fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the median nerve on 3.0 T MR scanners from different vendors. Materials and methods: IRB approved study including 16 healthy volunteers (9 women; mean age 30.6 ± 5.3 years). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the dominant wrist was performed on three 3.0 T MR scanners (GE, Siemens, Philips) using similar imaging protocols and vendor-proprietary hard- and software. Intra-, inter-reader and inter-vendor agreements were assessed. Results: ICCs for intra-/inter-reader agreements ranged from 0.843–0.970/0.846–0.956 for FA, and 0.840–0.940/0.726–0.929 for ADC, respectively. ANOVA analysis identified significant differences for FA/ADC measurements among vendors (p < 0.001/p < 0.01, respectively). Overall mean values for FA were 0.63 (SD ± 0.1) and 0.999 × 10−3 mm2/s (SD ± 0.134 × 10−3) for ADC. A significant negative measurement bias was found for FA values from the GE scanner (−0.05 and −0.07) and for ADC values from the Siemens scanner (−0.053 and −0.063 × 10−3 mm2/s) as compared to the remainder vendors Conclusion: FA and ADC values of the median nerve obtained on different 3.0 T MR scanners differ significantly, but are in comparison to the standard deviation of absolute values small enough to not have an impact on larger group studies or when substantial diffusion changes can be expected. However, caution is warranted in an individual patient when interpreting diffusion values from different scanner acquisitions

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.011

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.011;
PII
S0720-048X(13)00256-8;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
82
Journal Issue
10
Journal Page Range
p. e590-e596
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
Cuba
INIS RN
46022868
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ANISOTROPY; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTER CODES; DATA; DIFFUSION; PATIENTS; TENSORS; WOMEN
Descriptors DEC
ANIMALS; EVALUATION; FEMALES; INFORMATION; MAMMALS; MAN; PRIMATES; VERTEBRATES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.