Published November 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

On the equivalence of experimental B(E2) values determined by various techniques

  • 1. Department of Physics & Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1 (Canada)
  • 2. National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973-5000 (United States)

Description

We establish the equivalence of the various techniques for measuring B(E2) values using a statistical analysis. Data used in this work come from the recent compilation by B. Pritychenko et al. (2016) [5]. We consider only those nuclei for which the B(E2) values were measured by at least two different methods, with each method being independently performed at least twice. Our results indicate that most prevalent methods of measuring B(E2) values are equivalent, with some weak evidence that Doppler-shift attenuation method (DSAM) measurements may differ from Coulomb excitation (CE) and nuclear resonance fluorescence (NRF) measurements. However, such an evidence appears to arise from discrepant DSAM measurements of the lifetimes for 60Ni and some Sn nuclei rather than a systematic deviation in the method itself.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.06.012

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.06.012;
arXiv
arXiv:1606.09590v1;
PII
S0375-9474(16)30170-1;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Physics. A
Journal Volume
955
Journal Page Range
p. 145-155
ISSN
0375-9474
CODEN
NUPABL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.