The rebound effect representation in climate and energy models
- 1. University of Münster, Center of Applied Economic Research Münster (CAWM), am Stadtgraben 9, 48143 Münster (Germany)
- 2. Institute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), School of Business and Economics/E.ON Energy Research Center, RWTH Aachen University, Mathieustrasse 10, 52074 Aachen (Germany)
Description
We review the state-of-the-art and common practice of climate and energy modeling vis-á-vis the rebound literature. In particular, we study how energy system and economy-wide models include and quantify rebound effects—the gap between actual and expected saving or the behavioral adjustment in response to an energy efficiency improvement, in terms of energy or greenhouse gas emissions. First, we explain the interaction between drivers of energy efficiency improvements, energy efficiency policies, and the rebound effect to provide a framework for a general theoretical revision from micro- to macro-economic levels. Using this classification, we analyze rebound effect representations in empirical models by four dimensions: actors (industry or the production side, and private households or the consumption side), the aggregation level (from micro- to macro-economic levels), income level (developed or developing countries), and time (short- and long-run). Furthermore, we review rebound effect studies whose models focus on three drivers of energy efficiency improvements: market-based policies, non-market-based policies, and a costless energy efficiency improvement that holds other attributes constant (zero-cost breakthrough). We find that a clear representation of one or simultaneous drivers of energy efficiency improvements is crucial to target the goals of energy savings, greenhouse gas mitigation, and welfare gains. Under this broader view, the rebound effect is one additional phenomenon to be taken into consideration. This perspective provokes and provides additional policy implications. Reporting rebound effects as a stand-alone percentage is not sufficiently informative for policy considerations and the distinction of the aggregation level is important to asses the scalability of energy efficiency policies. Finally, we identify some ideas and motivations for future research. (topical review)
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc214Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Environmental Research Letters
- Journal Volume
- 15
- Journal Issue
- 12
- Journal Page Range
- [35 p.]
- ISSN
- 1748-9326
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 52086882
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY MODELS; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE GASES; HOUSEHOLDS; INCOME; MARKET; REVIEWS
- Descriptors DEC
- DOCUMENT TYPES; EFFICIENCY; GOVERNMENT POLICIES