Published May 1, 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

Evidence-based integrated environmental solutions for secondary lead smelters: Pollution prevention and waste minimization technologies and practices

  • 1. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (United States)
  • 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio (United States)
  • 3. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington DC (United States)
  • 4. WorldTek Inc, Cincinnati (United States)

Description

An evidence-based methodology was adopted in this research to establish strategies to increase lead recovery and recycling via a systematic review and critical appraisal of the published literature. In particular, the research examines pollution prevention and waste minimization practices and technologies that meet the following criteria: (a) reduce/recover/recycle the largest quantities of lead currently being disposed of as waste, (b) technically and economically viable, that is, ready to be diffused and easily transferable, and (c) strong industry interest (i.e., industry would consider implementing projects with higher payback periods). The following specific aims are designed to achieve the study objectives: Aim 1 - To describe the recycling process of recovering refined lead from scrap; Aim 2 - To document pollution prevention and waste management technologies and practices adopted by US stakeholders along the trajectory of LAB and lead product life cycle; Aim 3 - To explore improved practices and technologies which are employed by other organizations with an emphasis on the aforementioned criteria; Aim 4 - To demonstrate the economic and environmental costs and benefits of applying improved technologies and practices to existing US smelting operations; and Aim 5 - To evaluate improved environmental technologies and practices using an algorithm that integrates quantitative and qualitative criteria. The process of identifying relevant articles and reports was documented. The description of evidence was presented for current practices and technologies used by US smelters as well as improved practices and technologies. Options for integrated environmental solutions for secondary smelters were introduced and rank ordered on the basis of costs (i.e., capital investment) and benefits (i.e., production increases, energy and flux savings, and reduction of SO2 and slag). An example was provided to demonstrate the utility of the algorithm by detailing the costs and benefits associated with different combinations of practices and technologies. The evidence-based methodology documented in this research reveals that it is technically and economically feasible to implement integrated environmental solutions to increase lead recovery and recycling among US smelters. The working example presented in this research can be confirmed with US stakeholders and form the basis for implementable solutions in the lead smelter and product industries to help reverse the overall trend of declining life-cycle recycling rates.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.025

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.025;
PII
S0048-9697(09)00068-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
407
Journal Issue
10
Journal Page Range
p. 3239-3268
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44090750
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
LEAD; MATERIALS RECOVERY; POLLUTION; RECYCLING; SMELTING
Descriptors DEC
ELEMENTS; MANAGEMENT; METALS; PROCESSING; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WASTE PROCESSING

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.