Interpolation and mapping of probabilities for geochemical variables exhibiting spatial intermittency

In monitoring a minor geochemical element in groundwater or soils, a background population of values below the instrumental detection limit is frequently present. When those values are found in the monitoring process, they are assigned to the detection limit which, in some cases, generates a probability mass in the probability density function of the variable at that value (the minimum value that can be detected). Such background values could distort both the estimation of the variable at nonsampled locations and the inference of the spatial structure of variability of the variable. Two important problems are the delineation of areas where the variable is above the detection limit and the estimation of the magnitude of the variables inside those areas. The importance of these issues in geochemical prospecting or in environmental sciences, in general related with contamination and environmental monitoring, is obvious. In this paper the authors describe the two-step procedure of indicator kriging and ordinary kriging and compare it with empirical maximum likelihood kriging. The first approach consists of using a binary indicator variable for estimating the probability of a location being above the detection limit, plus ordinary kriging conditional to the location being above the detection limit. An estimation variance, however, is not available for that estimator. Empirical maximum likelihood kriging, which was designed to deal with skew distributions, can also deal with an atom at the origin of the distribution. The method uses a Bayesian approach to kriging and gives intermittency in the form of a probability map, its estimates providing a realistic assessment of their estimation variance. The pros and cons of each method are discussed and illustrated using a large dataset of As concentration in groundwater. The results of the two methods are compared by cross-validation