Published July 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Modelling the performance potential of forced and natural-draft biomass cookstoves using a hybrid Entropy-TOPSIS approach

  • 1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Larsgardsvegen 2, 6009, Ålesund (Norway)
  • 2. The Brew-Hammond Energy Center, College of Engineering, KNUST, Kumasi (Ghana)
  • 3. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) - Institute of Industrial Research (IIR), Regional Testing and Knowledge Center - RTKC, P.O. Box LG 576, Legon, Accra (Ghana)
  • 4. Department of Materials Engineering, College of Engineering, KNUST, Kumasi (Ghana)

Description

Highlights: • Renewable Energy technology selection is a multi-criteria decision-making process. • Study develops a framework in assessing the performance potential of cookstoves. • The framework combines Entropy and TOPIS methods for assessment of the cookstoves. • Experiments were conducted to determine thirteen cookstoves performance indicators. • Natural draft biomass cookstoves ranked best considering all performance indicators. Improved biomass cookstoves have become significantly important as a major technological intervention to aid in the efficient use of biomass fuels. However, the transfer of such technologies to end users do not match the quantity of designs churned out to the market. This study therefore develops a new framework that simultaneously integrates technical, economic, social/public health and environmental factors in assessing the performance potential of biomass cookstoves. Experiments were conducted to determine 13 performance indicators of 20 (forced and natural draft) improved biomass cookstoves and application of the developed methodological framework indicated two main findings: (1) The forced draft cookstoves ranked better with technical and environmental factors while the natural draft cookstoves ranked better with economic and social/public health factors; (2) Considering all four performance indicators simultaneously, the natural draft cookstoves ranked better than the forced draft cookstoves. The results are of significant relevance to governments and organisations for identification of technological designs that should be improved or implemented from a sustainability perspective.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106106

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106106;
PII
S0961953421001434;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Biomass and Bioenergy
Journal Volume
150
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0961-9534
CODEN
BMSBEO

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53106667
Subject category
S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
Descriptors DEI
BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; DECISION MAKING; ENTROPY; PUBLIC HEALTH; SIMULATION; SUSTAINABILITY
Descriptors DEC
ALTERNATIVE FUELS; ENERGY SOURCES; FUELS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.