Published August 19, 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Preoperative core needle biopsy is accurate in determining molecular subtypes in invasive breast cancer

  • 1. Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Second Road, Shanghai 200025 (China)
  • 2. Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Affiliated to Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizhaoju Road, Shanghai 200011 (China)
  • 3. Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Second Road, Shanghai 200025 (China)
  • 4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cell Biology, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 227 Chongqing Nan Road, Shanghai 200025 (China)

Description

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), HER2, and Ki67 have been increasingly evaluated by core needle biopsy (CNB) and are recommended for classifying breast cancer into molecular subtypes. However, the concordance rate between CNB and open excision biopsy (OEB) has not been well documented. Patients with paired CNB and OEB samples from Oct. 2009 to Feb. 2012 in Ruijin Hospital were included. ER, PgR, HER2, and Ki67 were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Patients with HER2 IHC 2+ were further examined by FISH. Cutoff value for Ki67 high expression was 14%. Molecular subtypes were constructed as follows: Luminal A, Luminal B, Triple Negative, and HER2 positive. There were 298 invasive breast cancer patients analyzed. Concordance rates for ER, PgR, and HER2 were 93.6%, 85.9%, and 96.3%, respectively. Ki67 expression was slightly higher in OEB than in CNB samples (29.3% vs. 26.8%, P = 0.046). Good agreement (κ = 0.658) was demonstrated in evaluating molecular subtypes between CNB and OEB, with a concordance rate of 77.2%. We also used a different Ki67 cutoff value (20%) for determining Luminal A and B subtypes in HR (hormone receptor) +/HER2- diseases and the overall concordance rate was 79.2%. However, using a cut-point of Ki67 either 14% or 20% for both specimens, there will be about 14% of HR+/HER2- specimens that are called Luminal A on CNB and Luminal B on OEB. CNB was accurate in determining ER, PgR, and HER2 status as well as non-Luminal molecular subtypes in invasive breast cancer. Ki67 should be retested on OEB samples in HR+/HER2- patients to accurately distinguish Luminal A from B tumors

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-390; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3765132

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
BMC cancer (Online)
Journal Volume
13
Journal Page Range
p. 390
ISSN
1471-2407

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
46123766
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
BIOPSY; MAMMARY GLANDS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; RECEPTORS
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; GLANDS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANS; PROTEINS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Chen et al.
Notes
PMCID: PMC3765132; PUBLISHER-ID: 1471-2407-13-390; PMID: 23957561; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:3765132; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.