Published July 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Physical and chemical effects of isopropanol exchange in cement-based materials

  • 1. Institute for Building Materials (IfB), ETH Zurich, Stefano-Franscini-Platz 3, CH-8093 Zurich (Switzerland)
  • 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (United States)

Description

Drying cement-based materials is a necessary step to characterize the microstructure by microscopy, adsorption, or mercury intrusion. The isopropanol (IPA) exchange method is commonly used to replace the pore solution prior to drying, as it reduces the capillary pressure and thereby helps to preserve the microstructure of the hydrated cementitious materials. However, some physical and chemical effects of IPA on hydration products have been reported. These effects cannot be completely avoided, but can be reduced by shortening the exchange duration, in particular for effects on ettringite. This study carried out experiments with different exchange durations and IPA removal techniques to address research gaps in the literature. For 1-mm cubes of cement paste with IPA diffusion coefficient of 1 × 10−11 m2/s, the compared exchange durations are 5 min, 15 min (value from the literature), 40 min (when the mixture at the sample center achieves 95% of the drop in surface tension from water to IPA), 80 min (when the IPA/water mixture at the sample center reaches an azeotrope), 5 h (when over 99% IPA is replaced at the sample center), and 24 h (prolonged exchange). After IPA exchange, samples were either directly dried at 40 °C with flushing N2 or washed by diethyl ether prior to N2 drying. Even though the exchange duration of 40 and 80 min, in theory, can reduce the damage from capillary pressure, the nitrogen adsorption results do not show any advantage in preventing microstructural alteration. The 5-h exchange provided results similar to the 24-h exchange, but the latter induced slightly more serious chemical effects resulting from the longer contact of IPA with hydration products. In addition, the compared IPA removal techniques do not show significant differences. Therefore, this study suggests using small samples (~1 mm) for microstructural studies following IPA exchange for a period corresponding to the time when 99% of the water (mole fraction) at the sample center is replaced.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106461

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106461;
PII
S0008884621001101;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Cement and Concrete Research
Journal Volume
145
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0008-8846
CODEN
CCNRAI

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.