Physical–chemical properties and evaluative fate modelling of 'emerging' and 'novel' brominated and organophosphorus flame retardants in the indoor and outdoor environment
- 1. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, P.O. Box 21060, SE 100 31 Stockholm (Sweden)
- 2. Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES), Stockholm University, SE 106 91 Stockholm (Sweden)
Description
Several groups of flame retardants (FRs) have entered the market in recent years as replacements for polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), but little is known about their physical–chemical properties or their environmental transport and fate. Here we make best estimates of the physical–chemical properties and undertake evaluative modelling assessments (indoors and outdoors) for 35 so-called 'novel' and 'emerging' brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and 22 organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs). A QSPR (Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship) based technique is used to reduce uncertainty in physical–chemical properties and to aid property selection for modelling, but it is evident that more, high quality property data are required for improving future assessments. Evaluative modelling results show that many of the alternative FRs, mainly alternative BFRs and some of the halogenated OPFRs, behave similarly to the PBDEs both indoors and outdoors. These alternative FRs exhibit high overall persistence (Pov), long-range transport potential (LRTP) and POP-like behaviour and on that basis cannot be regarded as suitable replacements to PBDEs. A group of low molecular weight alternative BFRs and non-halogenated OPFRs show a potentially better environmental performance based on Pov and LRTP metrics. Results must be interpreted with caution though since there are significant uncertainties and limited data to allow for thorough model evaluation. Additional environmental parameters such as toxicity and bioaccumulative potential as well as functionality issues should be considered in an industrial substitution strategy. - Highlights: • 'Best-estimates' of physical–chemical properties of alternative FRs are proposed. • The 'SMURF' model and the OECD 'The Tool' are used to estimate the environmental fate. • Many alternative BFRs and HOPFRs have similar environmental fate to PBDEs. • Among alternative FRs, certain low MW NHOPFRs are the least persistent. • Needs for experimental data for model evaluation are highlighted
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.106Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.106;
- PII
- S0048-9697(15)00276-4;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Science of the Total Environment
- Journal Volume
- 524-525
- Journal Page Range
- p. 416-426
- ISSN
- 0048-9697
- CODEN
- STENDL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47033683
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOLOGICAL ACCUMULATION; BROMINATION; CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; ENVIRONMENT; FLAMES; INDOORS; LONG-RANGE TRANSPORT; METRICS; OUTDOORS; PERFORMANCE; PHENYL ETHER; TOXICITY
- Descriptors DEC
- CHEMICAL REACTIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT; ETHERS; HALOGENATION; MASS TRANSFER; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC OXYGEN COMPOUNDS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.