Published December 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Accurate prediction of the wall shear stress in rod bundles with the spectral element method at high Reynolds numbers

Description

Highlights: • LES of the flow in a channel and in a rod bundle at high Reynolds number are performed. • Accurate prediction of the local wall shear stress requires finer resolution for LES simulations. • We demonstrate the advantage of the use of higher order polynomials for such calculations. - Abstract: Resolving flow near walls is critical to reproducing the high rates of shear that generate turbulence in high Reynolds number, wall-bounded flows. In the present study, we examine the resolution requirements for correctly reproducing mean flow quantities and wall shear stress distribution in a large eddy simulation using the spectral element method. In this method, derivatives are only guaranteed in a weak sense, and the same is true of quantities composed of derivatives, such as the wall shear stress. We are interested in what is required to resolve the wall shear stress in problems that lack homogeneity in at least one direction. The problem of interest is that of parallel flow through a rod bundle configuration. Several meshes for this problem are systematically compared. In addition, we conduct a study of channel flow in order to examine the issues in a canonical flow that contains spanwise homogeneity missing in rod bundle flow. In the case of channel flow, we compare several meshes and subgrid scale models. We find that typical measures of accuracy, such as the law of the wall, are not sufficient for determining the resolution of quantities that vary along the wall. Spanwise variation of wall shear stress in underresolved flows is characterized by spikes—physical points without well-defined derivatives of the velocity—found at element boundaries. These spikes are not particular to any subgrid scale model and are the unavoidable consequence of underresolution. Accurately reproducing the wall shear stress distribution, while minimizing the computational costs, requires increasing the number of elements along the wall (local h-refinement) and using very high order (N=19) basis functions (p-refinement). We suggest that while these requirements are not easily generalized to grid spacing guidelines, one can apply a general process: construct a mesh that progressively increases elements along any walls, and increase the order of basis functions until the distribution of wall shear stress or any other quantity of interest is smooth

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.08.012

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.08.012;
PII
S0142-727X(14)00105-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
Journal Volume
50
Journal Page Range
p. 287-299
ISSN
0142-727X
CODEN
IJHFD2

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47007783
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; FORECASTING; FUEL ELEMENT CLUSTERS; GRIDS; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; POLYNOMIALS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SCALE MODELS; SHEAR; STRESSES; TURBULENCE; VELOCITY; WALLS
Descriptors DEC
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; ELECTRODES; EVALUATION; FUEL ASSEMBLIES; FUNCTIONS; SIMULATION; STRUCTURAL MODELS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.