Risk comparison of some energy sources
Description
The paper focuses on energy sources of significance to the Swedish energy supply: hydro, nuclear, coal, natural gas, and oil. It describes severe multiple fatalities having occurred throughout the world during the last decades. The different phases of the whole energy cycle are covered. As exemplified in the paper the ''pure'' society with total protection and no risk is unfortunately an utopian ideal. This is especially true for the different energy sources available and required for the development of any healthy society. Illustrated by the jogger's dilemma, society must develop an integrated and comparative view on health and environmental risks associated to its main activities, one of the most important being energy supply. (author). 1 fig
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Imprint Title
- Methods for comparative risk assessment of different energy sources
- Imprint Pagination
- 154 p.
- Journal Page Range
- p. 111-116.
- ISSN
- 1011-4289
- Report number
- IAEA-TECDOC--671
INIS
- Country of Publication
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 24006322
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Numerical Data
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCIDENTS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPILED DATA; ENERGY SOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; NATURAL GAS; NUCLEAR POWER; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; POWER GENERATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SWEDEN; WASTES
- Descriptors DEC
- DATA; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; ELECTRIC POWER; EUROPE; EVALUATION; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; INFORMATION; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; NUMERICAL DATA; POWER; POWER PLANTS; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SCANDINAVIA; THERMAL POWER PLANTS