Published June 1, 2010 | Version v1
Journal article

Spinal Cord Tolerance for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
  • 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California (United States)
  • 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (United States)
  • 4. Departments of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (United States)
  • 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan (United States)
  • 6. University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, San Francisco, California (United States)
  • 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
  • 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas (United States)
  • 9. Departments of Human Oncology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin (United States)

Description

Purpose: Dosimetric data are reported for five cases of radiation-induced myelopathy after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to spinal tumors. Analysis per the biologically effective dose (BED) model was performed. Methods and Materials: Five patients with radiation myelopathy were compared to a subset of 19 patients with no radiation myelopathy post-SBRT. In all patients, the thecal sac was contoured to represent the spinal cord, and doses to the maximum point, 0.1-, 1-, 2-, and 5-cc volumes, were analyzed. The mean normalized 2-Gy-equivalent BEDs (nBEDs), calculated using an α/β value of 2 for late toxicity with units Gy 2/2, were compared using the t test and analysis of variance test. Results: Radiation myelopathy was observed at the maximum point with doses of 25.6 Gy in two fractions, 30.9 Gy in three fractions, and 14.8, 13.1, and 10.6 Gy in one fraction. Overall, there was a significant interaction between patient subsets and volume based on the nBED (p = 0.0003). Given individual volumes, a significant difference was observed for the mean maximum point nBED (p = 0.01). Conclusions: The maximum point dose should be respected for spine SBRT. For single-fraction SBRT 10 Gy to a maximum point is safe, and up to five fractions an nBED of 30 to 35 Gy 2/2 to the thecal sac also poses a low risk of radiation myelopathy.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.023

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.023;
PII
S0360-3016(09)00772-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
77
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 548-553
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
41102761
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
FRACTIONATED IRRADIATION; NEOPLASMS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIATION INJURIES; RADIOTHERAPY; SPINAL CORD
Descriptors DEC
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS; BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; DISEASES; DOSES; INJURIES; IRRADIATION; MEDICINE; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIATION EFFECTS; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.