Published May 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Quantifying biomass production for assessing ecosystem services of riverine landscapes

  • 1. Department of Animal Ecology and Physiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen (Netherlands)
  • 2. Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen (Netherlands)
  • 3. Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht (Netherlands)
  • 4. Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede (Netherlands)
  • 5. Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven (Netherlands)

Description

Highlights: • An approach for quantifying terrestrial biomass production of floodplains was developed. • Quantification of spatiotemporal development of biomass production in floodplains along the Rhine River from 1997 to 2012. • Biomass production of floodplains decreased due to land use changes and flood risk management. • Relevant management measures were side channel construction, floodplain lowering and vegetation removal. Society is increasingly in need of renewable resources to replace fossil fuels and to prevent resource depletion. River-floodplain systems are known to provide important societal functions and ecosystem services to mankind, such as production of vegetative biomass. In order to determine the potential of harvesting vegetative riparian biomass, the capacity of river systems to produce such biomass needs to be determined. We developed a method for quantifying the spatiotemporal development of annual biomass production in river floodplains. Vegetation specific growth rates were linked to a landscape classification system (i.e., the Ecotope System for National Waterways). Biomass production was calculated for floodplains along the three Rhine River distributaries (i.e., the rivers Waal, Nederrijn-Lek and IJssel) over a 15 year period (1997–2012). During this period several large scale river management measures were undertaken to reduce flood risks and improve the spatial quality of the Rhine River as part of the Room for the River program. Biomass production decreased by 12%–16% from 1997 to 2012 along the three distributaries, which may be a side effect of flood mitigation. Almost 90% of the biomass produced was non-woody (e.g., grass/hay, reed, crops), which decreased along all three river distributaries due to the abandonment of production grasslands and the physical reconstruction of floodplains (e.g., creation of side channels). Woody vegetation, however, showed a slight increase during the 15 year period likely owing to vegetation succession from shrubs to softwood forest.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.044

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.044;
PII
S0048969717334630;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
624
Journal Page Range
p. 1577-1585
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53034506
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
BIOMASS; CROPS; FLOODS; FORESTS; FOSSIL FUELS; HARVESTING; LAND USE; MITIGATION; PLANT GROWTH; RANGELANDS; REEDS; RESOURCE DEPLETION; RHINE RIVER; SHRUBS; SIDE EFFECTS
Descriptors DEC
ECOSYSTEMS; ENERGY SOURCES; FUELS; GRAMINEAE; GROWTH; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PLANTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; RIVERS; SURFACE WATERS; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.