Published October 1, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article

Automated Planning of Tangential Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Using Heuristic Optimization

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Canada)
  • 2. Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON (Canada)

Description

Purpose: To present an automated technique for two-field tangential breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning. Method and Materials: A total of 158 planned patients with Stage 0, I, and II breast cancer treated using whole-breast IMRT were retrospectively replanned using automated treatment planning tools. The tools developed are integrated into the existing clinical treatment planning system (Pinnacle3) and are designed to perform the manual volume delineation, beam placement, and IMRT treatment planning steps carried out by the treatment planning radiation therapist. The automated algorithm, using only the radio-opaque markers placed at CT simulation as inputs, optimizes the tangential beam parameters to geometrically minimize the amount of lung and heart treated while covering the whole-breast volume. The IMRT parameters are optimized according to the automatically delineated whole-breast volume. Results: The mean time to generate a complete treatment plan was 6 min, 50 s ± 1 min 12 s. For the automated plans, 157 of 158 plans (99%) were deemed clinically acceptable, and 138 of 158 plans (87%) were deemed clinically improved or equal to the corresponding clinical plan when reviewed in a randomized, double-blinded study by one experienced breast radiation oncologist. In addition, overall the automated plans were dosimetrically equivalent to the clinical plans when scored for target coverage and lung and heart doses. Conclusion: We have developed robust and efficient automated tools for fully inversed planned tangential breast IMRT planning that can be readily integrated into clinical practice. The tools produce clinically acceptable plans using only the common anatomic landmarks from the CT simulation process as an input. We anticipate the tools will improve patient access to high-quality IMRT treatment by simplifying the planning process and will reduce the effort and cost of incorporating more advanced planning into clinical practice.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.016

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.016;
PII
S0360-3016(10)03561-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
81
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 575-583
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
43066134
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ALGORITHMS; HEART; LUNGS; MAMMARY GLANDS; NEOPLASMS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY; SIMULATION
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DISEASES; DOSES; GLANDS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.