Published March 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Exergoeconomic comparison of double effect and combined ejector-double effect absorption refrigeration systems

  • 1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
  • 2. Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada L1H 7K4 (Canada)

Description

Highlights: ► Combined ejector double effect absorption systems are analyzed exergoeconomically. ► Effects of operating conditions on thermoeconomic parameters of the systems are studied. ► Heat transfer coefficients in components of the systems are calculated. ► Evaporator, absorber and solution heat exchangers are the most expensive components. ► In similar conditions the combined cycle is more economical than the series flow one. -- Abstract: At a particular temperature range, heat sources are not hot enough to drive lithium bromide double effect absorption refrigeration systems efficiently and are too hot to be used for the single effect systems because of the risk of crystallization. A combined ejector-double effect absorption cycle is a good choice to make effective use of heat sources at this temperature range for refrigeration purposes. In this study, detailed exergoeconomic analyses are performed for series flow double effect and combined ejector double effect systems in order to investigate and compare the influence of various operating parameters on investment costs of the overall systems and product cost flow rates. In addition, the proportion of component costs in the overall systems costs and exergoeconomic results are obtained. The results show that the combined cycle operates more economically compared to the double effect system.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.022

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.022;
PII
S0306-2619(12)00815-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Energy
Journal Volume
103
Journal Page Range
p. 700-711
ISSN
0306-2619
CODEN
APENDX

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.