Published November 1, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparing performance of multi-frequency bands Occam's receiver function inversion to standard linearized receiver function inversion

  • 1. Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, 272 Rama 6 Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok (Thailand)
  • 2. Curl-E Geophysics Co., Ltd., Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakorn Pathom (Thailand)

Description

Receiver function (RF) is a characterized waveform that sensitive to the sub-surface velocity structure near the seismic station. In the geophysical problem, an inversion scheme has been used for determining the structure model that corresponded to the observed data. Because RF inversion is a non-linear problem, the standard method such as linearized inversion suffered in the non-uniqueness of the results. Thus, using a stochastic optimization algorithm (e.g. Monte Carlo or Generic Algorithm) is the most interesting trend for solving the problem. However, their computation cost is high and the efficiency is strongly depended on user setting. In this work, Occam's inversion algorithm, which is popular in the electromagnetic method, and multi-frequency bands receiver function have been integrated to improve the efficiency of receiver function inversion. The propagation method has been applied for the calculation of seismogram in this work. The synthetic cases, which are thin low velocity zone model (TLVZ), broad low velocity zone model (BLVZ), thin high velocity zone model (THVZ) and broad high velocity zone model (BHVZ), were used to compare the performance of this newly implemented algorithm and the standard linearized inversion. Single frequency band (SFO) and multi-frequency bands Occam's inversion (MFO) have been tested for each case. For, TLVZ, THVZ and BHVZ, the MFO inversion provided better fitting results than SFO in most cases. Comparing to linearized inversion of CPS330, the MFO results still provide better performance. For the smooth low velocity structure in BLVZ model, both linearized and MFO can recover a significant structure of the true model. More concisely, the linearized inversion can recover the absolute velocity of the true model better than MFO. By the way, the MFO provides the best data fitting for the BLVZ. In summary, the MFO receiver function inversion that implemented in this study provides a new improved tool for a seismologist to investigating the subsurface structure. (paper)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1380/1/012061

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Physics. Conference Series (Online)
Journal Volume
1380
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
[11 p.]
ISSN
1742-6596

Conference

Title
Siam Physics Congress 2019 on Physics Beyond Disruption Society
Acronym
SPC2019
Dates
6-7 Jun 2019
Place
Songkhla (Thailand)

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
53062912
Subject category
S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS; S97: MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND COMPUTING;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
ALGORITHMS; EFFICIENCY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; SURFACES; WAVE FORMS
Descriptors DEC
CALCULATION METHODS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC