Optimization of transit bus fleet's life cycle assessment impacts with alternative fuel options
- 1. Department of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 (United States)
- 2. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180 (United States)
Description
Public transportation is one of the most promising transportation modes to reduce the environmental emissions of the transportation sector in the U.S. In order to mitigate the environmental impacts brought by the transit bus system, new energy buses are introduced into the vehicle market. The goal of this study is to find an optimal bus fleet combination for different driving conditions to minimize life cycle cost, greenhouse gas emissions, and conventional air pollutant emission impacts. For this purpose, a Multi-Objective Linear Programming approach is used to select the optimum bus fleet combinations. Given different weight scenarios, this method could effectively provide solutions for decision makers with various budget constraints or emission reduction requirements. The results indicate that in heavily congested driving cycles such as the Manhattan area, the battery electric bus is the dominant vehicle type, while the hybrid bus has more balanced performances in most scenarios because of its lower initial investment comparing to battery electric buses. Petroleum powered buses have seldom been selected by the model. The trade-off analysis shows that the overall greenhouse gas impact performance is sensitive to the life cycle cost after certain points, which could provide valuable information for the bus fleet combination planning. - Highlights: • Hybrid-Life Cycle Assessment analysis approach for transit bus operations. • Optimizing the economic and sustainability impacts of transit bus fleet operation. • CO2 emissions and other air pollutants related health and environmental damage cost. • Trade-offs between CO2 emissions and cost of transit bus fleet operation.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.018Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.018;
- PII
- S0360-5442(15)01210-4;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy (Oxford)
- Journal Volume
- 93
- Journal Issue
- Part 1
- Journal Page Range
- p. 323-334
- ISSN
- 0360-5442
- CODEN
- ENEYDS
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48003774
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- AIR POLLUTION; AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; BUSES; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; ECONOMICS; ELECTRIC BATTERIES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; GREENHOUSE GASES; INVESTMENT; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LIFE-CYCLE COST; MARKET; MITIGATION; OPTIMIZATION; PETROLEUM; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSPORTATION SECTOR
- Descriptors DEC
- CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; COST; ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS; ENERGY SOURCES; ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS; ENERGY SYSTEMS; EVALUATION; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; POLLUTION; POLLUTION ABATEMENT; VEHICLES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.