Published October 20, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Sodiation vs. Lithiation of FePO4: A comparative kinetic study

  • 1. Institute for Materials Science, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden (Germany)
  • 2. Fraunhofer IKTS Dresden, 01277 Dresden (Germany)

Description

Highlights: • Comparison of intercalation kinetics: sodiation vs. lithiation of FePO4. • Rate constant of sodiation is significantly lower compared to lithiation. • Solid state diffusion of sodium in FePO4 is slower compared to lithium. • Larger activation energies of sodiation compared to lithiation of FePO4. - Abstract: A comparative study of sodiation and lithiation of FePO4 host material for secondary sodium- and lithium-ion batteries is performed. To ensure the best possible comparability, NaFePO4 based electrodes are prepared by an electrochemical displacement technique using LiFePO4 as the starting material. The electrodes are identical in view of particle size distribution, active material loading, binder, conductive additives, and carbon coating, etc. All differences in the kinetics are exclusively determined by the substitution of the alkali metal cation. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is carried out at different temperatures. Kinetic parameters as the exchange current density and the diffusion coefficients of sodium and lithium in the FePO4 host material are obtained by fitting the data to an appropriate equivalent circuit. The study reveals substantially slower intercalation kinetics and larger activation energies for sodiation in comparison to lithiation of FePO4. This is most likely attributed to the different ionic radii and molar masses of sodium and lithium.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.041

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.041;
PII
S0013-4686(16)31929-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Electrochimica Acta
Journal Volume
216
Journal Page Range
p. 412-419
ISSN
0013-4686
CODEN
ELCAAV

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.