There is a newer version of the record available.

Published November 21, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part I, AJCC staging system, NCCN guidelines, and borderline resectable disease

  • 1. Medical College of Wisconsin. Department of Radiology (United States)
  • 2. University of Washington. Department of Radiology (United States)
  • 3. LSU Health – Shreveport Ochsner-LSU Health – Shreveport. Department of Radiology (United States)
  • 4. Moffitt Cancer Center. Gastrointestinal Oncology (United States)
  • 5. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Department of Radiology (United States)
  • 6. University of California San Francisco. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (United States)
  • 7. Columbia University Medical Center. Department of Radiology (United States)
  • 8. Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph. Department of Radiology (France)
  • 9. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Abdominal Imaging Department (United States)
  • 10. University of Arizona College of Medicine. Department of Radiology (United States)
  • 11. IRCCS SDN (Italy)
  • 12. Massachusetts General Hospital. Department of Radiology (United States)

Description

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy with a poor 5-year survival rate. Accurate staging of PDAC is an important initial step in the development of a stage-specific treatment plan. Different staging systems/consensus statements convened by different societies and academic practices are currently used. The most recent version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor/node/metastases (TNM) staging system for PDAC has shifted its focus from guiding management to assessing prognosis. In order to preoperatively define the resectability of PDAC and to guide management, additional classification systems have been developed. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, one of the most commonly used systems, provide recommendations on the management and the determination of resectability for PDAC. The NCCN divides PDAC into three categories of resectability based on tumor-vessel relationship: 'resectable,' 'borderline resectable,' and 'unresectable'. Among these, the borderline disease category is of special interest given its evolution over time and the resulting variations in the definition and the associated recommendations for management between different societies. It is important to be familiar with the evolving criteria, and treatment and follow-up recommendations for PDAC. In this article, the most current AJCC staging (8th edition), NCCN guidelines (version 2.2019—April 9, 2019), and challenges and controversies in borderline resectable PDAC are reviewed.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Abdominal Radiology (Online)
Journal Volume
45
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 716-728
ISSN
2366-0058

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55057567
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
ABDOMEN; CARCINOMAS; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIALS; DISEASE INCIDENCE; DUCTS; EPITHELIOMAS; GYNECOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE; METASTASES; PANCREAS; RADIOLOGY; RECOMMENDATIONS; SURVIVAL CURVES
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CARCINOMAS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; ENDOCRINE GLANDS; GLANDS; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; TESTING

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019