Published November 17, 2015 | Version v1
Report

Issues of incompatibility of dipole beam separation schemes with EIC physics

  • 1. Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)

Description

This report addresses the question, can the risk of an eRHIC machine be reduced by replacing the crab-cavities through a dipole field in the IR to separate the electron and hadron beams. In the following, several scenarios to integrate a separation dipole in the IR design will be described. For each of the scenarios the challenges and problems to realize this in practice will be detailed. In addition, the impact on the detector design and the EIC physics program will also be discussed. Several physics requirements need to be integrated into the interaction region design, in order to perform the physics program as described in the EIC White Paper and in the RHIC Design Study. These requirements are also described in detail on a dedicated page of the eRHIC-wiki. The main requirements are described here.

Availability note (English)

Available from https://www.bnl.gov/isd/documents/92775.pdf; PURL: http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1335408/

Additional details

Publishing Information

Imprint Pagination
19 p.
Report number
BNL--111857-2015-IR

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
48046999
Subject category
S43: PARTICLE ACCELERATORS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
BEAM DYNAMICS; BEAM STACKING; BEAM-BEAM INTERACTIONS; BROOKHAVEN ERHIC; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DESIGN; DIPOLES; ELECTRONS; HADRONS; RADIATION DETECTORS
Descriptors DEC
ACCELERATORS; DYNAMICS; ELEMENTARY PARTICLES; EVALUATION; FERMIONS; LEPTONS; LINAC-RING ACCELERATORS; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; MECHANICS; MULTIPOLES

Optional Information

Contract/Grant/Project number
SC00112704
Funding organization
USDOE Office of Science - SC, Nuclear Physics - NP (SC-26) (United States)
Secondary number(s)
OSTIID--1335408