Published December 1, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Effect on the Earth system of realizing a 1.5 °C warming climate target after overshooting to the 2 °C level

  • 1. Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 3173-25 Showamachi, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0001 (Japan)
  • 2. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2108-11 Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama, Kanagawa 240-0115 (Japan)

Description

An Earth system model (ESM) was used to investigate the effect of reaching the target of 1.5 °C warming (relative to preindustrial levels) after overshooting to the 2 °C level with respect to selected global environment indicators. Two scenarios were compared that diverged after reaching the 2 °C level: one stayed at the 2 °C level, and the other cooled to the 1.5 °C level. Unlike the internationally coordinated model intercomparison projects, the scenarios were developed for a specific climatic model with emissions and land use scenarios consistent with socioeconomic projections from an integrated assessment model. The ESM output resulted in delayed realization of the 1.5 °C and 2 °C targets expected for 2100. The cumulative CO2 emissions for 2010−2100 (2300) were 358 (−53) GtCO2 in the 2 °C scenario and −337 (−936) GtCO2 in the 1.5 °C scenario. We examined the effect of overshooting on commonly used indicators related to surface air temperature, sea surface temperature and total ocean heat uptake. Global vegetation productivity at 2100 showed around a 5% increase in the 2 °C scenario without overshooting compared with the 1.5 °C scenario with overshooting, considered to be caused by more precipitation and stronger CO2 fertilization. A considerable difference was found between the two scenarios in terms of Arctic sea ice, whereas both scenarios indicated few corals would survive past the 21st century. The difference in steric sea level rise, reflecting total cumulative ocean heat uptake, between the two scenarios was <2 cm in 2100, and around 9 cm in 2300 in the Pacific Island region. A large overshoot may reduce the eventual difference between targets (i.e. 1.5 °C in contrast to 2 °C), particularly in terms of the indicators related to total ocean heat uptake, and to sensitive biological thresholds. (letter)

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5199

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Research Letters
Journal Volume
14
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
[10 p.]
ISSN
1748-9326

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
51043796
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATES; CORALS; EMISSION; FERTILIZATION; HEAT; LAND USE; OCEANIA; PRECIPITATION; SEA LEVEL; SEAS; SURFACE AIR; UPTAKE
Descriptors DEC
AIR; ANIMALS; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CHALCOGENIDES; CNIDARIA; COELENTERATA; ENERGY; FLUIDS; GASES; INVERTEBRATES; LEVELS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; SEPARATION PROCESSES; SURFACE WATERS