Published April 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Intensified alternative to purify methyl-Ethyl ketone in a framework of green process

  • 1. Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Guanajuato, Noria Alta S/n, Guanajuato, Gto., 36050 (Mexico)
  • 2. CONACyT, CIATEC A.C. Centro de Innovación Aplicada en Tecnologías Competitivas, Omega 201, Col. Industrial Delta, 37545, León, Gto (Mexico)

Description

Highlights: • Design of Intensified Alternative to Purify Methyl-Ethyl Ketone. • Multi-Objective Optimization Process Considering Economic, Environmental, Controllability and Safety Issues. • Methyl-Ethyl Ketone Purification. • Energy Efficient Alternative to purify Methyl-Ethyl-Ketone. Methyl-Ethyl Ketone (MEK) is a promising bulk chemical due to its several applications. MEK can be produced by hydrogenation of 2, 3-Butanediol, a chemical previously produced by fermentation. As hydrogenation results, the output is composed of water, isobutyraldehyde, 2, 3-Butanediol, and Methyl-ethyl ketone. Because of the thermodynamic interactions, two azeotropes are formed; consequently, the purification of that mixture is challenging. Current needs promote the generation of alternatives with good economic and environmental performance, however, inherent safety and good controllability must also be accomplished. In this study an intensified process is proposed to reduce the energy investment for MEK purification. The alternative is a hybrid process that combines the advantages of using a liquid-liquid extraction column for handling the azeotropes aforementioned. Additionally, this proposal is compared with four alternatives previously proposed based only on distillation. All alternatives were modeled in Aspen Plus and were optimized considering four targets, the total annual cost, the eco-indicator 99, the individual risk, and the condition number as economic, environmental, safety and controllability indexes, respectively. As a result, interesting trends among objectives and design variables were found. Additionally, the intensified design reported an energy investment of 6.78 MJfuel/kgMEK, and the best pure distillation alternative 35.5 MJfuel/KgMEK.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119641

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2020.119641;
PII
S0360544220327481;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy (Oxford)
Journal Volume
220
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0360-5442
CODEN
ENEYDS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.