NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0822: A Phase 2 Study of Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Combination With Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Creators
- 1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)
- 2. NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (United States)
- 3. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (United States)
- 4. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee (United States)
- 5. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (United States)
- 6. North Main Radiation Oncology, Providence, Rhode Island (United States)
- 7. London Regional Cancer Program/Western Ontario, London, Ontario (Canada)
- 8. Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (United States)
- 9. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey (United States)
- 10. Piedmont Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia (United States)
- 11. Main Line Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania (United States)
- 12. University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States)
Description
Purpose: To evaluate the rate of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity of neoadjuvant chemoradiation with capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in cT3-4 rectal cancer. Methods and Materials: Patients with localized, nonmetastatic T3 or T4 rectal cancer <12 cm from the anal verge were enrolled in a prospective, multi-institutional, single-arm study of preoperative chemoradiation. Patients received 45 Gy with IMRT in 25 fractions, followed by a 3-dimensional conformal boost of 5.4 Gy in 3 fractions with concurrent capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CAPOX). Surgery was performed 4 to 8 weeks after the completion of therapy. Patients were recommended to receive FOLFOX chemotherapy after surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was acute grade 2 to 5 GI toxicity. Seventy-one patients provided 80% probability to detect at least a 12% reduction in the specified GI toxicity with the treatment of CAPOX and IMRT, at a significance level of .10 (1-sided). Results: Seventy-nine patients were accrued, of whom 68 were evaluable. Sixty-one patients (89.7%) had cT3 disease, and 37 (54.4%) had cN (+) disease. Postoperative chemotherapy was given to 42 of 68 patients. Fifty-eight patients had target contours drawn per protocol, 5 patients with acceptable variation, and 5 patients with unacceptable variations. Thirty-five patients (51.5%) experienced grade ≥2 GI toxicity, 12 patients (17.6%) experienced grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, and pCR was achieved in 10 patients (14.7%). With a median follow-up time of 3.98 years, the 4-year rate of locoregional failure was 7.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0%-13.7%). The 4-year rates of OS and DFS were 82.9% (95% CI: 70.1%-90.6%) and 60.6% (95% CI: 47.5%-71.4%), respectively. Conclusion: The use of IMRT in neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer did not reduce the rate of GI toxicity
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.05.005Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.05.005;
- PII
- S0360-3016(15)00506-4;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
- Journal Volume
- 93
- Journal Issue
- 1
- Journal Page Range
- p. 29-36
- ISSN
- 0360-3016
- CODEN
- IOBPD3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47028321
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CHEMOTHERAPY; CLINICAL TRIALS; DIARRHEA; FAILURES; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; RADIOTHERAPY; RECTUM; SURGERY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL CALCULATIONS; TOXICITY
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; INTESTINES; LARGE INTESTINE; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ORGANS; RADIOLOGY; SYMPTOMS; TESTING; THERAPY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.