Published November 1, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparison of DT neutron production codes MCUNED, ENEA-JSI source subroutine and DDT

  • 1. Reactor Physics Department, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova cesta 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana (Slovenia)
  • 2. Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB (United Kingdom)
  • 3. Departamento de Ingeniería Energética, E.T.S. Ingenieros Industriales, UNED, C/Juan del Rosal 12, 28040 Madrid (Spain)
  • 4. VR Association, Uppsala University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, PO Box 516, SE-75120 Uppsala (Sweden)

Description

Highlights: • Results of three codes capable of simulating the accelerator based DT neutron generators were compared on a simple model where only a thin target made of mixture of titanium and tritium is present. Two typical deuteron beam energies, 100 keV and 250 keV, were used in the comparison. • Comparisons of the angular dependence of the total neutron flux and spectrum as well as the neutron spectrum of all the neutrons emitted from the target show general agreement of the results but also some noticeable differences. • A comparison of figures of merit of the calculations using different codes showed that the computational time necessary to achieve the same statistical uncertainty can vary for more than 30× when different codes for the simulation of the DT neutron generator are used. - Abstract: As the DT fusion reaction produces neutrons with energies significantly higher than in fission reactors, special fusion-relevant benchmark experiments are often performed using DT neutron generators. However, commonly used Monte Carlo particle transport codes such as MCNP or TRIPOLI cannot be directly used to analyze these experiments since they do not have the capabilities to model the production of DT neutrons. Three of the available approaches to model the DT neutron generator source are the MCUNED code, the ENEA-JSI DT source subroutine and the DDT code. The MCUNED code is an extension of the well-established and validated MCNPX Monte Carlo code. The ENEA-JSI source subroutine was originally prepared for the modelling of the FNG experiments using different versions of the MCNP code (−4, −5, −X) and was later extended to allow the modelling of both DT and DD neutron sources. The DDT code prepares the DT source definition file (SDEF card in MCNP) which can then be used in different versions of the MCNP code. In the paper the methods for the simulation of the DT neutron production used in the codes are briefly described and compared for the case of a simple accelerator-based DT neutron source.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.03.036

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.03.036;
PII
S0920-3796(16)30232-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Fusion Engineering and Design
Journal Volume
109-111
Journal Issue
Part A
Journal Page Range
p. 164-168
ISSN
0920-3796
CODEN
FEDEEE

Conference

Title
12. international symposium on fusion nuclear technology
Acronym
ISFNT-12
Dates
14-18 Sep 2015
Place
Jeju Island (Korea, Republic of)

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.