Published June 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Impacts of channel direction on bone tissue engineering in 3D-printed carbonate apatite scaffolds

  • 1. Department of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582 (Japan)
  • 2. Aichi Center for Industry and Science Technology, 1267-1 Akiai, Yakusa-cho, Toyota-shi, Aichi-ken, 470-0356 (Japan)

Description

Highlights: • Scaffolds with channels directed differently are fabricated by 3D printing. • Channel direction is a critical parameter for bone regeneration. • Channel connection to the periosteum is important for a smooth replacement by bone. • Biaxial channels result in too rapid scaffold resorption and bone disappearance. • Micro/nanopores are insufficient, and channels are necessary for bone regeneration. Although the channel architecture of a scaffold is critical for bone regeneration, little is known for the channel direction. In this study, four types of carbonate apatite cylindrical scaffolds; scaffolds with biaxial channels (VH-scaffold), with uniaxial vertical channels (V-scaffold), with uniaxial horizontal channels (H-scaffold), and without channels (N-scaffold), were implanted in a rabbit femur defect for 4 and 12 weeks. Although the largest bone was formed 4 weeks post-implantation in the VH-scaffold, newly formed bone disappeared with the scaffold after 12 weeks. Thus, biaxial channels resulted in the rapid dissolution of the scaffold and were counterproductive in long-term bone regeneration. The V-scaffold that had channels connected to the periosteum was gradually resorbed throughout 12 weeks post-implantation. The percentage of mineralized bone in the V-scaffolds was equal to that in the natural bone. The resorption and bone percentage of H-scaffolds that had no channels connected to the periosteum were slower and lower, respectively, than those of V-scaffolds. Thus, channels should be connected to the periosteum to achieve smooth replacement by the new bone. In the N-scaffold, much less bone was formed inside the scaffold. This study contributes to providing a design guide for scaffold development in bone engineering.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109686

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109686;
PII
S0264127521002380;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Materials and Design
Journal Volume
204
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0264-1275
CODEN
MADSD2

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54033130
Subject category
S60: APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES; S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE;
Descriptors DEI
3D PRINTING; BONE TISSUES; CARBONATES; DESIGN; DISSOLUTION; FEMUR; IN VIVO; REGENERATION
Descriptors DEC
ANIMAL TISSUES; BODY; CARBON COMPOUNDS; COMPUTER-AIDED FABRICATION; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; FABRICATION; ORGANS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; SKELETON

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.