Published 2017 | Version v1
Book

Investigation of reactivity differences in cylinder arrays using various fill geometries with constant mass

  • 1. URENCO USA, PO Box 1789, Eunice, NM (United States)
  • 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Nevada Las Vegas - UNLV, Las Vegas, NV (United States)

Description

The factors affecting criticality safety are well understood by the nuclear engineering industry. Array configurations present multiple challenges to the industry due to the competing effects that are present in array systems - most notably interaction/spacing, moderation, and reflection. However, even the fissile mass geometry has been shown to complicate array systems. This attribute is also seen in filled UF6 cylinders, thus making it important to understand the reactivity in cylinder arrays. The process of filling UF6 cylinders results in non-uniform cylinder fill geometries. Due to the non-uniform fill, it becomes necessary to model a specific UF6 mass, in cylinder arrays, in different ways to ensure understanding of the reactivity of the system. Some of the ways to model the UF6 include: spreading the UF6 mass across the cylinder, all UF6 on the bottom of the cylinder, UF6 consolidated in the middle of the cylinder, and UF6 consolidated on the outside of the cylinder. Spreading the UF6 mass across the cylinder is accomplished by adjusting the UF6 density to achieve the given UF6 mass, whereas all the other scenarios use a fixed UF6 density with varying thicknesses to achieve the given UF6 mass. A different modeling approach, which helps to capture mixture effects, is to model the UF6 mass using the nominal UF6 density along with the void space for a given mass and distribute the mixture throughout the entire cylinder. This paper compares the reactivity of a cylinder array at a constant mass value using three different modeling techniques - completely filling the cylinder using a reduced UF6 density, filling the cylinder with nominal UF6 density and void space throughout the cylinder (same amount of void space as in the last technique), and all UF6 in the bottom of the cylinder (all void space on top of UF6). The results demonstrate that completely filling the cylinder produces the most reactive UF6 cylinder array system. (authors)

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
American Nuclear Society - ANS
Imprint Place
La Grange Park, IL (United States)
ISBN
978-0-89448-740-8
Imprint Pagination
7 p.

Conference

Title
Nuclear Criticality Safety Division topical meeting - Criticality safety, pushing boundaries by modernizing and integrating data, methods, and regulations
Acronym
ANS NCSD 2017
Dates
10-15 Sep 2017
Place
Carlsbad, NM (United States)

Optional Information

Notes
6 refs.; Available on CD-ROM from American Nuclear Society - ANS, 555 North Kensington Avenue, La Grange Park, IL 60526 (United States)