A decision-making approach for delineating sites which are potentially contaminated by heavy metals via joint simulation
Creators
- 1. Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan (China)
- 2. Department of Soil and Water Conservation, National Chun-Hisn University, Taiwan (China)
Description
This work develops a new approach for delineating sites that are contaminated by multiple soil heavy metals and applies it to a case study. First a number of contaminant sample data are transformed into multiple spatially un-correlated factors using Uniformly Weighted Exhaustive Diagonalization with Gauss iterations (U-WEDGE). Sequential Gaussian simulation (sGs) is then used to generate sets of realizations of each resultant factor. These are then transformed into sets of sGs contaminant distribution realizations, which are then used to analyze the local and spatial (global) uncertainties in the distribution and concentration of contaminants via joint simulation. Finally, Info-Gap Decision Theory (IGDT) is used to consider different monitoring and or remediation regimes based on the analysis of contaminant realization spatial uncertainty. In our case study each heavy metal contaminant was considered individually and together with all other heavy metals; as the number of heavy metals considered increased, higher critical proportion values of local probability were chosen to obtain a low global uncertainty (to provide high reliability). Info-Gap Decision Theory (IGDT) yielded the most appropriate critical proportion values which minimized information loss in terms of specific goals. When the false negative rate is set to zero, meaning that it is necessary to monitor all potentially polluted areas, the corresponding false positive rates are at least 63%, 65%, 66%, 68%, 70%, and 78% to yield robustness levels of 0.50, 0.60, 0.70, 0.80, 0.90, and 1.00 respectively. However, when the false negative rate tolerance threshold is raised to 50%, the false positive rate tolerance which yields robustness levels of 0.50, 0.60, 0.70, 0.80, 0.90 and 1.00 drop to 12%, 14%, 15%, 18%, 20%, and 39%. The case study demonstrates the effectiveness of the developed approach at making robust decisions concerning the delineation of sites contaminated by multiple heavy metals. - Highlights: • We simulate the concentrations of heavy metals using multivariate co-simulation. • We assess the uncertainty of the simulated concentrations of the heavy metals. • We use a robust decision-making approach to delineate contaminated sites. • We developed a GIS program based on our approaches delineate contaminated sites.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.030Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.030;
- PII
- S0269-7491(15)30244-X;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Environmental Pollution (1987)
- Journal Volume
- 211
- Journal Page Range
- p. 98-110
- ISSN
- 0269-7491
- CODEN
- ENPOEK
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48046175
- Subject category
- S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGICAL CONCENTRATION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HEAVY METALS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION
- Descriptors DEC
- ELEMENTS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICS; METALS; STATISTICS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.