Published May 2016 | Version v1
Miscellaneous

Quantitative risk assessment of digitalized safety systems

  • 1. KAIST, Daejeon (Korea, Republic of)
  • 2. UNIST, Ulasn (Korea, Republic of)

Description

A report published by the U.S. National Research Council indicates that appropriate methods for assessing reliability are key to establishing the acceptability of digital instrumentation and control (I and C) systems in safety-critical plants such as NPPs. Since the release of this issue, the methodology for the probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) of digital I and C systems has been studied. However, there is still no widely accepted method. Kang and Sung found three critical factors for safety assessment of digital systems: detection coverage of fault-tolerant techniques, software reliability quantification, and network communication risk. In reality the various factors composing digitalized I and C systems are not independent of each other but rather closely connected. Thus, from a macro point of view, a method that can integrate risk factors with different characteristics needs to be considered together with the micro approaches to address the challenges facing each factor.

Part of:
Proceedings of the KNS 2016 Spring Meeting

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
KNS
Imprint Place
Daejeon (Korea, Republic of)
Imprint Title
Proceedings of the KNS 2016 spring meeting
Imprint Pagination
[1 CD-ROM]
Journal Page Range
[4 p.]

Conference

Title
2016 spring meeting of the KNS
Dates
11-13 May 2016
Place
Jeju (Korea, Republic of)

INIS

Country of Publication
Korea, Republic of
Country of Input or Organization
Korea, Republic of
INIS RN
48048789
Subject category
S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference, Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
CONTROL SYSTEMS; ENGINEERED SAFETY SYSTEMS; FAULT TREE ANALYSIS; HAZARDS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY ANALYSIS
Descriptors DEC
NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; SYSTEM FAILURE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Optional Information

Notes
24 refs, 2 figs, 1 tab