High rates of clinically relevant incidental findings by total-body CT scanning in trauma patients; results of the REACT-2 trial
Creators
- 1. Academic Medical Center, Trauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
- 2. Academic Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
- 3. Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Trauma and emergency surgery, Nijmegen (Netherlands)
- 4. University Medical Center Groningen, Trauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Groningen (Netherlands)
- 5. University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam (Netherlands)
- 6. University of Basel Hospital, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Basel (Switzerland)
- 7. Academic Medical Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
- 8. Academic Medical Center, Clinical Research Unit, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Description
To determine whether there is a difference in frequency and clinical relevance of incidental findings detected by total-body computed tomography scanning (TBCT) compared to those by the standard work-up (STWU) with selective computed tomography (CT) scanning. Trauma patients from five trauma centres were randomized between April 2011 and January 2014 to TBCT imaging or STWU consisting of conventional imaging with selective CT scanning. Incidental findings were divided into three categories: 1) major finding, may cause mortality; 2) moderate finding, may cause morbidity; and 3) minor finding, hardly relevant. Generalized estimating equations were applied to assess differences in incidental findings. In total, 1083 patients were enrolled, of which 541 patients (49.9 %) were randomized for TBCT and 542 patients (50.1 %) for STWU. Major findings were detected in 23 patients (4.3 %) in the TBCT group compared to 9 patients (1.7 %) in the STWU group (adjusted rate ratio 2.851; 95%CI 1.337-6.077; p < 0.007). Findings of moderate relevance were detected in 120 patients (22.2 %) in the TBCT group compared to 86 patients (15.9 %) in the STWU group (adjusted rate ratio 1.421; 95%CI 1.088-1.854; p < 0.010). Compared to selective CT scanning, more patients with clinically relevant incidental findings can be expected by TBCT scanning. (orig.)
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4598-6Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 27
- Journal Issue
- 6
- Journal Page Range
- p. 2451-2462
- ISSN
- 0938-7994
- CODEN
- EURAE3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 48061464
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- CLINICAL TRIALS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DATA COMPILATION; DOCUMENTATION; INJURIES; PATIENTS; WOUNDS
- Descriptors DEC
- DATA; DATA PROCESSING; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; INFORMATION; INJURIES; PROCESSING; TESTING; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Collaborations
- REACT-2 study group