There is a newer version of the record available.

Published March 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

An immersed interface-lattice Boltzmann method for fluid-structure interaction

  • 1. Department of Mathematics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (United States)
  • 2. Key Laboratory of Transit Physics, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu (China)
  • 3. Departments of Mathematics, Applied Physical Sciences, and Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (United States)

Description

Highlights: • An immersed interface-lattice Boltzmann method (II-LBM) is developed for modeling fluid-structure systems. • This method extends previously developed immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann methods (IB-LBMs). • Jump conditions for the lattice Boltzmann method are determined for normal forces distributed along an immersed interface. • The derived jump conditions correspond to pressure jump conditions in conventional IIMs. • The II-LBM shows higher order of accuracy and superior volume conservation than the IB-LBM. An immersed interface-lattice Boltzmann method (II-LBM) is developed for modeling fluid-structure systems. The key element of this approach is the determination of the jump conditions that are satisfied by the distribution functions within the framework of the lattice Boltzmann method where forces are imposed along a surface immersed in an incompressible fluid. In this initial II-LBM, the discontinuity related to the normal component of the interfacial force is sharply resolved by imposing the relevant jump conditions using an approach that is analogous to imposing the corresponding pressure discontinuity in the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. We show that the jump conditions for the distribution functions are the same in both single-relaxation-time and multi-relaxation-time LBM formulations. Tangential forces are treated using the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method (IB-LBM). In our implementation, a level set approach is used to impose jump conditions for rigid-body models. For flexible boundary models, we describe the moving interface by interpolating the positions of marker points that move with the fluid. The II-LBM introduced herein is compared to a direct forcing IB-LBM for rigid-body fluid-structure interaction, and a classical IB-LBM for cases involving elastic interfaces. Higher order accuracy is observed with the II-LBM as compared to the IB-LBM for selected benchmark problems. Although our II-LBM only imposes jump conditions corresponding to the pressure, the error in the velocity field is demonstrated to be much smaller for the II-LBM than the IB-LBM. The II-LBM is also demonstrated to provide superior volume conservation when simulating flexible boundaries.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109807

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109807;
PII
S0021999120305817;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Computational Physics (Print)
Journal Volume
428
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0021-9991
CODEN
JCTPAH

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.