The effect of size-control policy on unified energy and carbon efficiency for Chinese fossil fuel power plants
Creators
- 1. Institute of Poyang Lake Eco-economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013 (China)
- 2. Department of International Trade, Inha University, 253 Yonghyun-dong, Nam-gu, Incheon 402-751 (Korea, Republic of)
- 3. College of Economics and Management and Research Centre for Soft Energy Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 29 Yudao Street, Nanjing 210016 (China)
Description
This paper examines the effect of size control policy on the energy and carbon efficiency for Chinese fossil fuel power industry. For this purpose, we propose two non-radial directional distance functions for energy/carbon efficiency analysis of fossil fuel electricity generation. One is named a total-factor directional distance function that incorporates the inefficiency of all input and output factors to measure the unified (operational and environmental) efficiency of fossil fuel power plants, and the other is called an energy–environmental directional distance function that can be used to measure the energy–environmental performance of fossil fuel electric power plants. Several standardized indicators for measuring unified efficiency and energy–environmental performance are derived from the two directional distance functions. An empirical study of 252 fossil fuel power plants in China is conducted by using the proposed approach. Our empirical results show that there exists a significant positive relationship between the plant size and unified efficiency, the five state-owned companies show lower unified efficiency and energy–environmental performance than other companies. It is suggested that Chinese government might need to consider private incentives and deregulation for its state-owned enterprises to improve their performance proactively. - Highlights: • Two non-radial directional distance functions are presented for energy/carbon efficiency analysis. • An empirical study of 252 fossil fuel power plants in China is conducted. • The five state-owned companies show lower unified efficiency and energy–environmental performance
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.031Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.031;
- PII
- S0301-4215(14)00178-5;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 70
- Journal Page Range
- p. 193-200
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 46064301
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CARBON; CHINA; DEREGULATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS; POWER GENERATION
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; EFFICIENCY; ELEMENTS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; NONMETALS; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.