Published January 1, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

International Brachytherapy Practice Patterns: A Survey of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
  • 2. Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden (Netherlands)
  • 3. Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta (Canada)
  • 4. Department of Oncology, University College London Hospital, London (United Kingdom)
  • 5. Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa (Japan)
  • 6. Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne (Australia)
  • 7. Beatson Oncology Centre, Glasgow, Scotland (United Kingdom)
  • 8. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN (United States)
  • 9. Department of Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  • 10. Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck (Austria)
  • 11. Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus (Denmark)
  • 12. Department of Radiation Therapy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano (Italy)
  • 13. The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (United States)
  • 14. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (United States)

Description

Purpose: To determine current practice patterns with regard to gynecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy among international members of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) in Japan/Korea (Asia), Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Europe (E), and North America (NAm). Methods and Materials: A 32-item survey was developed requesting information on brachytherapy practice patterns and standard management for Stage IB–IVA cervical cancer. The chair of each GCIG member cooperative group selected radiation oncology members to receive the survey. Results: A total of 72 responses were analyzed; 61 respondents (85%) used HDR. The three most common HDR brachytherapy fractionation regimens for Stage IB–IIA patients were 6 Gy for five fractions (18%), 6 Gy for four fractions (15%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (11%); for Stage IIB–IVA patients they were 6 Gy for five fractions (19%), 7 Gy for four fractions (8%), and 7 Gy for three fractions (8%). Overall, the mean combined external-beam and brachytherapy equivalent dose (EQD2) was 81.1 (standard deviation [SD] 10.16). The mean EQD2 recommended for Stage IB–IIA patients was 78.9 Gy (SD 10.7) and for Stage IIB–IVA was 83.3 Gy (SD 11.2) (p = 0.02). By region, the mean combined EQD2 was as follows: Asia, 71.2 Gy (SD 12.65); ANZ, 81.18 (SD 4.96); E, 83.24 (SD 10.75); and NAm, 81.66 (SD, 6.05; p = 0.02 for Asia vs. other regions).The ratio of brachytherapy to total prescribed dose was significantly higher for Japan (p = 0.0002). Conclusion: Although fractionation patterns may vary, the overall mean doses administered for cervical cancer are similar in Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and North America, with practitioners in Japan administering a significantly lower external-beam dose but higher brachytherapy dose to the cervix. Given common goals, standardization should be possible in future clinical trials.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.030

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.030;
PII
S0360-3016(10)03453-X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
82
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 250-255
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.