Published July 1, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article

A Planned Neck Dissection Is Not Necessary in All Patients With N2-3 Head-and-Neck Cancer After Sequential Chemoradiotherapy

  • 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA (United States)
  • 2. Department of Neurosugery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA (United States)
  • 3. Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA (United States)
  • 4. Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (United States)
  • 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA (United States)

Description

Purpose: To assess the role of a planned neck dissection (PND) after sequential chemoradiotherapy for patients with head-and-neck cancer with N2–N3 nodal disease. Methods and Materials: We reviewed 90 patients with N2–N3 head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma treated between 1991 and 2001 on two sequential chemoradiotherapy protocols. All patients received induction and concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorocuracil, with or without tirapazamine. Patients with less than a clinical complete response (cCR) in the neck proceeded to a PND after chemoradiation. The primary endpoint was nodal response. Clinical outcomes and patterns of failure were analyzed. Results: The median follow-up durations for living and all patients were 8.3 years (range, 1.5–16.3 year) and 5.4 years (range, 0.6–16.3 years), respectively. Of the 48 patients with nodal cCR whose necks were observed, 5 patients had neck failures as a component of their recurrence [neck and primary (n = 2); neck, primary, and distant (n = 1); neck only (n = 1); neck and distant (n = 1)]. Therefore, PND may have benefited only 2 patients (4%) [neck only failure (n = 1); neck and distant failure (n = 1)]. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate for those with a clinical partial response (cPR) undergoing PND (n = 30) was 53%. The 5-year neck control rates after cCR, cPR→pCR, and cPR→pPR were 90%, 93%, and 78%, respectively (p = 0.36). The 5-year disease-free survival rates for the cCR, cPR→pCR, and cPR→pPR groups were 53%, 75%, and 42%, respectively (p = 0.04). Conclusion: In our series, patients with N2–N3 neck disease achieving a cCR in the neck, PND would have benefited only 4% and, therefore, is not recommended. Patients with a cPR should be treated with PND. Residual tumor in the PND specimens was associated with poor outcomes; therefore, aggressive therapy is recommended. Studies using novel imaging modalities are needed to better assess treatment response.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.042

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.042;
PII
S0360-3016(11)03134-8;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Journal Volume
83
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
p. 994-999
ISSN
0360-3016
CODEN
IOBPD3

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
44019397
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CARCINOMAS; CHEMOTHERAPY; COMBINED THERAPY; FAILURES; HEAD; NECK; PATIENTS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DISEASES; GENE AMPLIFICATION; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.